2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2006.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational prediction of erosion of air heater elements by fly ash particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is practical to estimate the erosion damages resulting from particle impacts (Zhang, Reuterfors, McLaury, Shirazi, & Rybicki, 2007). Researches on these damage predictions are always focused on the area of engineering environment, particularly in certain working conditions (Mbabazi & Sheer, 2006). However, the research on SPE caused by wind-blown sand is seldom seen (Hao, Xing & Yang, 2010;Liu et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is practical to estimate the erosion damages resulting from particle impacts (Zhang, Reuterfors, McLaury, Shirazi, & Rybicki, 2007). Researches on these damage predictions are always focused on the area of engineering environment, particularly in certain working conditions (Mbabazi & Sheer, 2006). However, the research on SPE caused by wind-blown sand is seldom seen (Hao, Xing & Yang, 2010;Liu et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The erosion rate of all the ribbed bends were greatly reduced compared with that of the bare bend. Mbabazi et al13 tested the accuracy of an erosion model in predicting the erosion by fly ash of air heater elements by comparing the results obtained by the CFD simulations with the results obtained in experimental investigations. They found that augmentation the turbulence of the gas–particle flow might increase the frequency of particle–wall collisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of wear prediction depends on three aspects: the accuracy of computing the flow field, the accuracy of tracking the trajectories of particles and the rationality of erosion model. In terms of computing the flow field, the k‐ε turbulence model is a basic and efficient method to calculate the fluid phase turbulent as well as considering particulate erosion problems 6–11, 13. Large eddy method is more accurate than the k‐ε turbulence model for computing the flow field, which can also be applied in wear prediction 12.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%