2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.dmpk.2019.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational prediction of cytochrome P450 inhibition and induction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Molecular docking study showed that SSd displayed a high binding energy of −11.3 kcal/mol. It has been reported that the amino acid residues of Phe57, Phe108, Ile120, Leu211, Phe241, Ile301, Phe304, Ile369, Leu373, Arg105, Leu364, Arg365, Leu366, Phe367, Pro368, Ala370, Met371, Arg372 and Glu374 in CYP3A4 played a key role in ligand binding 38‐44 . Another study suggested that Phe57, Arg105, Arg106, Phe108, Phe215, Met371, Arg372, Leu373, Glu374 and Arg375 were involved in interaction between sauchinone and CYP3A4 protein 45 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Molecular docking study showed that SSd displayed a high binding energy of −11.3 kcal/mol. It has been reported that the amino acid residues of Phe57, Phe108, Ile120, Leu211, Phe241, Ile301, Phe304, Ile369, Leu373, Arg105, Leu364, Arg365, Leu366, Phe367, Pro368, Ala370, Met371, Arg372 and Glu374 in CYP3A4 played a key role in ligand binding 38‐44 . Another study suggested that Phe57, Arg105, Arg106, Phe108, Phe215, Met371, Arg372, Leu373, Glu374 and Arg375 were involved in interaction between sauchinone and CYP3A4 protein 45 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The xenobiotic-sensing receptors are ligand-activated transcription factors belonging structurally either to the nuclear receptors or the basic-helix–loop–helix Per-Arnt-Sim (bHLH-PAS) proteins. Today, activation of these receptors and subsequent CYP induction can be studied with a number of in silico, in vitro, and cell-based methods enabling relatively good prediction of in vivo induction (Bernasconi et al 2019 ; Kato 2020 ; Pelkonen et al 2008 ). However, not all the compounds found to be activators in cell or other in vitro assays are actual in vivo activators because of pharmacokinetic or other factors.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Cyp Inductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction on the basis of in vitro studies is now an integral part of early drug development (Lu and Di 2020 ) as well as of the medicines agency guidelines (EMA, FDA, and MHLW/PMDA). Computational models such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic models are now being used for quantitative prediction of in vivo interactions from in vitro experiments (Kato 2020 ; Min and Bae 2017 ), and these models are used extensively by drug developers before and during clinical trials. After preclinical studies, there is an ultimate need of human in vivo studies and observations on inhibition and induction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the foreign substances [3]. More than 95% of FDA-approved drugs are metabolized by six isoforms of these subfamilies [4,5]. The CYP 2C subfamily is one of the most important CYP families, consisting of two main isoforms, 2C9 and 2C19.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, combined models are also represented in the literature, where either the applied datasets [13] or the algorithms [17] are combined. A great selection of the previous models (not just for the 2C9 isoform) can be found in the recent review by Kato [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%