2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Prediction of All Lanthanide Aqua Ion Acidity Constants

Abstract: The protonation state of lanthanide-ligand complexes, or lanthanide-containing porous materials, with many Brønsted acid sites can change due to proton loss/gain reactions with water or other heteroatomcontaining compounds. Consequently, variations in the protonation state of lanthanide-containing species affect their molecular structure and desired properties. Lanthanide(III) aqua ions undergo hydrolysis and form hydroxides; they are the best characterized lanthanide-containing species with multiple Brønsted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energies of each species in eqn ( 1) and ( 2) were calculated with all-electron single-point energy calculations, as performed in our previous work, where we calculated the acidity constants of Ln aqua ions. 12 All energy calculations were done with the M06 functional, a relativistic second order Douglas-Kroll-Hess (DKH2) Hamiltonian, 13,14 segmented all-electron relativistically contracted (SARC) basis set 15 for the Ln atoms, and the minimally augmented 16 ma-def2-TZVPP basis set 17,18 for ligand and water atoms. Studies demonstrate that the M06 functional is a reliable choice for the calculations of thermodynamic properties in broad variety of chemical systems, 19 including the Ln-containing molecules and Ln complexes.…”
Section: Binding Energies From Electronic Structure Calculations With...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energies of each species in eqn ( 1) and ( 2) were calculated with all-electron single-point energy calculations, as performed in our previous work, where we calculated the acidity constants of Ln aqua ions. 12 All energy calculations were done with the M06 functional, a relativistic second order Douglas-Kroll-Hess (DKH2) Hamiltonian, 13,14 segmented all-electron relativistically contracted (SARC) basis set 15 for the Ln atoms, and the minimally augmented 16 ma-def2-TZVPP basis set 17,18 for ligand and water atoms. Studies demonstrate that the M06 functional is a reliable choice for the calculations of thermodynamic properties in broad variety of chemical systems, 19 including the Ln-containing molecules and Ln complexes.…”
Section: Binding Energies From Electronic Structure Calculations With...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two methods are employed for the prediction of the p K a value with explicit solvents. One method is through thermodynamic integration (TI) of vertical energy gaps between deprotonated and protonated species, , and the other one is calculated from AIMD with enhanced samplings, which gives the free energy of the hydrolysis reaction. We use here the second method in this work. The hydrolysis reaction is a nonredox reaction which could be dealt with by 4f-in-core PPs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure is similar to the calculations using LnPP1 by Cantu and coworkers. 118 6, the pKa values computed by LnPP2 are generally in good agreement with those computed by LnPP1 considering that the pKa value is very sensitive with the free energy results. Not surprisingly, the difference of the pKa value of Gd calculated by LnPP1 and LnPP2 is larger, with an error of 1.6, consistent with the situation in the binding energy calculation using LnBS2-DZVP, as shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Aqueous Solution Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first hydrolysis constant, logβ 1 , typically shows a linear dependence on the ratio of charge to M–O distance, z / d . Although their average M–O distances are approximately the same, their logβ 1 values are vastly different, with −7.53 for Dy 3+ and −0.92 for Bi 3+ . , This is another indicator of the anomalous behavior of aqueous Bi 3+ ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…19 Although their average M−O distances are approximately the same, their logβ 1 values are vastly different, with −7.53 for Dy 3+ and −0.92 for Bi 3+ . 20,21 This is another indicator of the anomalous behavior of aqueous Bi 3+ ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%