2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8678-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Ocean Acoustics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
875
0
18

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,312 publications
(976 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
875
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…3e). The intermediate empirical spreading model (15log) underestimated the TL by up tõ 20dB, while the spherical spreading model (20log), which is generally used for deep waters (Jensen et al, 2011), overestimated the TL in the Celtic Sea with a maximum value of~20dB.…”
Section: Differences In Sound Propagation Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3e). The intermediate empirical spreading model (15log) underestimated the TL by up tõ 20dB, while the spherical spreading model (20log), which is generally used for deep waters (Jensen et al, 2011), overestimated the TL in the Celtic Sea with a maximum value of~20dB.…”
Section: Differences In Sound Propagation Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, in the much simpler 1D case over a flat bottom, where k n = const, the spatial potential would be a combination of φ n (ξ) = exp(±ik n ξ/ ), see e.g. Jensen et al (2011). For a 2HD varying bathymetry, by similarity we look for solutions of the form…”
Section: General Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the pressure produced at a distance r by a source of the same intensity as the bottom disturbance, but in an infinite, homogeneous medium with the ambient density ρ 0 (Jensen et al 2011). …”
Section: Analytical Solution On a Plane Beachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in the case of adiabatic mode propagation, it is expected that this mode 1 energy will experience some redistribution in the water column due to the effective narrowing of the waveguide by the shelfbreak; therefore, it is important to discriminate between energy variation due to adiabatic mode propagation alone and energy variation due to enhanced mode coupling. These differences are examined by calculating the transmission loss (TL) for case ISW-SB using adiabatic mode theory (Jensen et al, 1994) and coupled mode theory, which are shown in Fig. 7.…”
Section: Energy Enhancement Due To Mode Coupling At the Shelfbreakmentioning
confidence: 99%