2015
DOI: 10.1242/dev.116343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational modelling of embryonic stem-cell fate control

Abstract: The maintenance of pluripotency in embryonic stem cells (ESCs), its loss during lineage specification or its re-induction to generate induced pluripotent stem cells are central topics in stem cell biology. To uncover the molecular basis and the design principles of pluripotency control, a multitude of experimental, but also an increasing number of computational, studies have been published. Here, we consider recent reports that apply computational or mathematical modelling approaches to describe the regulatory… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
4
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bona fide iPSCs are, like murine embryonic stem cells (ESCs), competent to form blastocyst chimaeras and are considered to occupy a state of naïve pluripotency similar to that in the pre-implantation embryo Boroviak et al, 2015). Experimental and computational efforts have led to circuitry mapping of the core TF program that maintains ESC self-renewal under defined conditions (Chen et al, 2008;Niwa et al, 2009;MacArthur et al, 2012;Dunn et al, 2014;Herberg & Roeder, 2015;Rue & Martinez Arias, 2015;Yachie-Kinoshita et al, 2018). Experimental and computational efforts have led to circuitry mapping of the core TF program that maintains ESC self-renewal under defined conditions (Chen et al, 2008;Niwa et al, 2009;MacArthur et al, 2012;Dunn et al, 2014;Herberg & Roeder, 2015;Rue & Martinez Arias, 2015;Yachie-Kinoshita et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bona fide iPSCs are, like murine embryonic stem cells (ESCs), competent to form blastocyst chimaeras and are considered to occupy a state of naïve pluripotency similar to that in the pre-implantation embryo Boroviak et al, 2015). Experimental and computational efforts have led to circuitry mapping of the core TF program that maintains ESC self-renewal under defined conditions (Chen et al, 2008;Niwa et al, 2009;MacArthur et al, 2012;Dunn et al, 2014;Herberg & Roeder, 2015;Rue & Martinez Arias, 2015;Yachie-Kinoshita et al, 2018). Experimental and computational efforts have led to circuitry mapping of the core TF program that maintains ESC self-renewal under defined conditions (Chen et al, 2008;Niwa et al, 2009;MacArthur et al, 2012;Dunn et al, 2014;Herberg & Roeder, 2015;Rue & Martinez Arias, 2015;Yachie-Kinoshita et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This unique identity is determined by a self-reinforcing interaction network of TFs. Experimental and computational efforts have led to circuitry mapping of the core TF program that maintains ESC self-renewal under defined conditions (Chen et al, 2008;Niwa et al, 2009;MacArthur et al, 2012;Dunn et al, 2014;Herberg & Roeder, 2015;Rue & Martinez Arias, 2015;Yachie-Kinoshita et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a number of experimental strategies (reviewed in [25]) and computational models (reviewed in [26]) have been applied to reveal the molecular mechanisms and interactions underlying Nanog heterogeneity. Analysing the dynamic behaviour of small-scale TF network models, we previously identified two potential mechanisms that consistently account for bimodal Nanog distributions and reversible state transitions between different expression levels [22,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because genome-wide studies using mouse and human ESCs have revealed the architecture of the gene regulatory network (GRN) responsible for maintaining their selfrenewal and pluripotency, [68][69][70] several computational models describing the mutual regulation of the genes involved in such GRNs have also been developed. 71,72 In those models, stem cell differentiation is described by the transition from stem cell states, in which a set of self-renewal genes are upregulated, to the differentiation states, in which differentiation genes are upregulated and are negatively regulated by the self-renewal genes. Temporal change in the expression of the self-renewal genes in a given GRN can be modeled with multiple approaches, such as Boolean and ODEs.…”
Section: Models For Describing Stem Cell Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%