2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.calphad.2014.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational modeling of elastic constants as a function of temperature and composition in Zr–Nb alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1d, there is no intermetallic compound in the ZreNb binary phase diagram [12]; the bcc structure is a sole equilibrium configuration possible for solute Nb atoms precipitating from the Zr matrix. The bcc Nb particles are softer than the hcp Zr matrix with respect to shear modulus (28 GPa [13,14] and 33 GPa [15], respectively); however, they may be the Orowan-type strong obstacles due to the following crystallographic constraint. Unlike the well-known crystal orientation relationship proposed by Burgers for taking into account the structural transition from bcc Zr to hcp Zr, {0002} hcp //{110} bcc [16,17] [10,11]; the discrepancy arises presumably because the lattice constant of bcc Nb is significantly different from that of bcc Zr: the difference is~8.5% [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1d, there is no intermetallic compound in the ZreNb binary phase diagram [12]; the bcc structure is a sole equilibrium configuration possible for solute Nb atoms precipitating from the Zr matrix. The bcc Nb particles are softer than the hcp Zr matrix with respect to shear modulus (28 GPa [13,14] and 33 GPa [15], respectively); however, they may be the Orowan-type strong obstacles due to the following crystallographic constraint. Unlike the well-known crystal orientation relationship proposed by Burgers for taking into account the structural transition from bcc Zr to hcp Zr, {0002} hcp //{110} bcc [16,17] [10,11]; the discrepancy arises presumably because the lattice constant of bcc Nb is significantly different from that of bcc Zr: the difference is~8.5% [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26] Atomistic simulations have also been conducted to study temperature-dependent elastic constants. [27][28][29][30] Combining firstprinciples calculations and phonon calculations, Wang et al computed elastic stiffness coefficients of Al, Cu, Ni, Mo, Ta, NiAl, and Ni 3 Al as a function of temperature for the temperature range from 0 K to each melting point of the crystals and the results agreed with the experimental measurements. 27 The temperature-and composition-dependent elastic constants of bcc Nb 1Àx Zr x (0 r x r 1) solid solution phase were analyzed with the thermodynamic CALPHAD-type model, where the values of critical parameters were determined from available experimental data and first-principles calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Many materials properties, e.g., elastic constants, feature a qualitatively very different behavior if finite-temperature contributions are taken into account [13][14][15][16]. For example, thermal expansion typically causes a strong decrease of elastic constants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%