2009
DOI: 10.1115/1.3129705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Modeling of Damage Development in Composite Laminates Subjected to Transverse Dynamic Loading

Abstract: This paper presents a robust computational model for the response of composite laminates to high intensity transverse dynamic loading emanating from local impact by a projectile and distributed pressure pulse due to a blast. Delaminations are modeled using a cohesive type tie-break interface introduced between sublaminates while intralaminar damage mechanisms within the sublaminates are captured in a smeared manner using a strain-softening plastic-damage model. In the latter case, a nonlocal regularization sch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the prediction of structural behavior and failure of monolithic and sandwich hulls subjected to impulsive loadings, limited work was reported in the literature (Deshpande and Fleck, 2005;Hoo Fatt and Palla, 2009;Tilbrook et al, 2009;Forghani and Vaziri, 2009). Although physically based, most models rely on homogeneous description of the composite material at the scale of the single ply or of the sub-laminate (Hashin, 1980;Hashin and Rotem, 1973;Puck and Schurmann, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Concerning the prediction of structural behavior and failure of monolithic and sandwich hulls subjected to impulsive loadings, limited work was reported in the literature (Deshpande and Fleck, 2005;Hoo Fatt and Palla, 2009;Tilbrook et al, 2009;Forghani and Vaziri, 2009). Although physically based, most models rely on homogeneous description of the composite material at the scale of the single ply or of the sub-laminate (Hashin, 1980;Hashin and Rotem, 1973;Puck and Schurmann, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Permanent indentation is mainly caused by low‐velocity impact or static indentation process. During the past few years, research on the composite laminates subjected to low‐velocity impact or static indentation mainly focus on multiple damage modes inside the laminates with their interactions and evolution processes . Many researchers were also concerned with the mechanical responses and contact behaviors of the laminates .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies a different cohesive law is used [229,230]. Some simulations use the tie-break interface in LS-DYNA which also provides for a bilinear traction-separation law [231]. Airoldi [228] showed examples of multiple delaminations that propagate unstably and lead to immediate loss of load-carrying capability and also of slowly-propagating interlaminar damage that does not affect the overall response.…”
Section: Low Velocity Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, l cz;z ( l cz;zx and it is recommended to have at least two or three elements in the cohesive zone defined by l cz;z in order to capture the stress distribution in that zone. Linear exponential [153,199,233,234] Others: [229][230][231] High velocity impacts Bilinear: [272,273] Other: [274] Sandwich structures Bilinear: [282-285, 288, 295, 296] Others: [278,283,284,286,287,297,299] Crash absorbers for automotive applications…”
Section: Low Velocity Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%