2006
DOI: 10.1080/10255840601022734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational model of the movement of the human muscles of mastication during opening and closing of the jaw

Abstract: Muscle fibre bundles comprising the four major muscles of mastication in the human being were studied in cadavers. Markers were placed along each muscle fibre bundle by means of serial dissections. The 3D coordinates of each marker were tabulated and imported to Cinema 4D, a software animation program. Origins and insertions of each fibre bundle were also digitized and imported, as were the coordinates of the surface of the skull, the mandible and temporomandibular joint. It was then possible to visualize the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other limitations included simplified Table 1. tooth guidance and bolus properties, sparse representation of the infra-hyoid muscles, and omission of the tongue. Models of the human jaw are difficult to validate (Hannam, 2005;Leon et al, 2006;Peck and Hannam, 2007;de Zee et al, 2007) since detailed exploration of the muscles and joints is restricted technically and ethically. Like others, our model is at best a working hypothesis strengthened by its performance of tasks with outcomes falling within normal ranges (Hannam, 2005;Peck and Hannam, 2007).…”
Section: Model Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other limitations included simplified Table 1. tooth guidance and bolus properties, sparse representation of the infra-hyoid muscles, and omission of the tongue. Models of the human jaw are difficult to validate (Hannam, 2005;Leon et al, 2006;Peck and Hannam, 2007;de Zee et al, 2007) since detailed exploration of the muscles and joints is restricted technically and ethically. Like others, our model is at best a working hypothesis strengthened by its performance of tasks with outcomes falling within normal ranges (Hannam, 2005;Peck and Hannam, 2007).…”
Section: Model Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As jaw biomechanics are difficult to study directly, modelling has become an important investigative tool (van Eijden, 2000;Koolstra, 2002;Hannam, 2005;Koolstra and van Eijden, 1995, 1997, 2005Peck and Hannam, 2007;van Eijden and Koolstra, 1998;Peck et al, 2000Peck et al, , 2002Sanguineti et al, 1998;Hansma et al, 2006;Stavness et al, 2006;Leon et al, 2006;de Zee et al, 2007). Simulations of the chewing cycle are rare however.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this study is to validate the DTI method to reconstruct muscle architecture. An established manual method for reconstruction is the dissection of fiber bundles from a fixated muscle and the subsequent digitization of their position (Loh et al 2003;Leon et al 2006;Kim et al 2007;Rosatelli et al 2008;Fung et al 2009;Mihata et al 2009;Powers et al 2010;Ravichandiran et al 2010). To validate the DTI method, we measured the architecture of one muscle applying (i) the DTI method and (ii) the manual digitization method and compared the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][9], are mostly limited to a few sparse locations in the muscle while only a few studies have conducted a detailed dissection, e.g. [10], [11]. Ultrasound imaging is now frequently used for in vivo measurements because of its fast acquisition time and accessibility, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%