2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2012
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2012.6346602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational model of electrical stimulation of a retinal ganglion cell with hexagonally arranged electrodes

Abstract: In retinal prosthetic devices an electrode array is used for electrical stimulation of retinal neurons to induce phosphene perception. The shape and size of the evoked phosphenes are in part dependent on the spatial patterns of retinal activation. In this study, a computational model of a cat beta retinal ganglion cell (RGC) excitation following simulated electrical stimulation was investigated. Seven epiretinal disk electrodes with hexagonal configuration (Hex electrodes) were used. 100 µs/phase anodic-first … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of somal RGC stimulation, the receptive field location and hence the visual percept corresponds to the site of stimulation as RGC receptive fields are located close to the somata in the macula region, where retinal prostheses aim to stimulate. However, in the case of axonal RGC stimulation (such as might happen with the Argus II), the corresponding visual percept will often be offset from the site of stimulation [46][47][48]. Our data suggest that eGlu excites somata but not axons (figures 3 and 7), so we expect that with a neurotransmitter-based retinal prosthesis the site of stimulation will always correspond with RGC receptive field locations in visual space.…”
Section: Selective Stimulation Of Rgc Somata With Glutamate and The C...mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In the case of somal RGC stimulation, the receptive field location and hence the visual percept corresponds to the site of stimulation as RGC receptive fields are located close to the somata in the macula region, where retinal prostheses aim to stimulate. However, in the case of axonal RGC stimulation (such as might happen with the Argus II), the corresponding visual percept will often be offset from the site of stimulation [46][47][48]. Our data suggest that eGlu excites somata but not axons (figures 3 and 7), so we expect that with a neurotransmitter-based retinal prosthesis the site of stimulation will always correspond with RGC receptive field locations in visual space.…”
Section: Selective Stimulation Of Rgc Somata With Glutamate and The C...mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Recent retinal models [19][20][21][22][23] disregarded a representative three dimensional reconstruction of the ganglion layer for evaluating the direct stimulation of RGCs.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The layers included in the simulation model are the polyimide carrier of the electrodes, vitreous medium, photoreceptor layer, ganglionic layer, ganglion cell soma and retinal pigment epithelium. This schematic representation of the retina is built to a greater degree of anatomical likeness than previously published works [19][20][21][22][23]. The sizes of each layer and electrical parameters are listed in Table 1 [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Electric Field Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…bipolar, horizontal and amacrine cells, ON-and OFF networks) are excluded because of severe rod and cone photoreceptor impairment that cannot drive synaptic connection started with a photocurrent input. The proper conductivity, permittivity and thickness of the layers formerly mentioned can be found in table I [34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Electric Field Responsementioning
confidence: 99%