2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-8645-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Methods for Corpus Annotation and Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(90 reference statements)
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For syntactic variation, we applied the D-Level Analyser (Lu, 2009) using the D-Level scale (Lu, 2014). This tool builds off of the Stanford Partof-Speech Tagger (Toutanova and Manning, 2000) and the Collins Parser (Collins, 2003) and produces a scaled analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For syntactic variation, we applied the D-Level Analyser (Lu, 2009) using the D-Level scale (Lu, 2014). This tool builds off of the Stanford Partof-Speech Tagger (Toutanova and Manning, 2000) and the Collins Parser (Collins, 2003) and produces a scaled analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the D-Level Analyser (Lu, 2009) to evaluate syntactic variation and complexity of human references using the revised D-Level Scale (Lu, 2014). Figure 3 show a similar syntactic variation in all three datasets.…”
Section: Syntactic Variation and Discourse Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The results of the 14 syntactic complexity measures generated by the L2SCA can be easily sent to Excel or SPSS for statistical analyses. A detailed, step-by-step procedure for how to use the analyser is illustrated in Lu (2014).…”
Section: The L2 Syntactic Complexity Analyzermentioning
confidence: 99%