2015
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b02103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Mechanism Study of Catalyst-Dependent Competitive 1,2-C→C, −O→C, and −N→C Migrations from β-Methylene-β-silyloxy-β-amido-α-diazoacetate: Insight into the Origins of Chemoselectivity

Abstract: Doyle et al. [J. Am. Chem. Soc.201313512441247] recently reported an efficient catalyst-controlled chemoselectivity of competitive 1,2-C→C, −O→C, and −N→C migrations from β-methylene-β-silyloxy-β-amido-α-diazoacetates using dirhodium or copper catalysts. With the aid of density functional theory calculations, the present study systematically probed the mechanism of the aforementioned reactions and the origins of the catalyst-controlled chemoselectivity. Similar to the method reported in the literature, simplif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(120 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2015, Xue et al studied a cyclopropanation reaction catalyzed by the achiral catalysts Rh 2 (OAc) 4 and Rh 2 (S-PTTL) 4 using the B3LYP-D3 method and found that the dirhodium catalyst could reduce the Gibbs free energy barriers and the chiral ligands in the dirhodium catalyst could affect the addition reactions . In 2016, the chemoselectivity of dirhodium-catalyzed [3 + 2] reactions was investigated by Xue’s group and the enantioselectivity of the C–H insertion reaction was investigated by Xie’s group with different DFT methods. In 2017, Wei et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015, Xue et al studied a cyclopropanation reaction catalyzed by the achiral catalysts Rh 2 (OAc) 4 and Rh 2 (S-PTTL) 4 using the B3LYP-D3 method and found that the dirhodium catalyst could reduce the Gibbs free energy barriers and the chiral ligands in the dirhodium catalyst could affect the addition reactions . In 2016, the chemoselectivity of dirhodium-catalyzed [3 + 2] reactions was investigated by Xue’s group and the enantioselectivity of the C–H insertion reaction was investigated by Xie’s group with different DFT methods. In 2017, Wei et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, to quantify different contributions to the regioselectivity, we also performed distortion–interaction analyses for the four key transition state structures, which was equivalent to the activation strain model. As shown in Table , the complex 1 B / 1 B ′ can be decomposed into two fragments, 1 B -1 and 1 B -2 / 1 B ′-1 and 1 B ′-2 . According to Table , the two catalyst systems have the similar results in the distortion energies (Δ E dist ), that is, Δ E dist of ortho -cyclization transition states ( TS1 A and TS1 A ′ ) are more favorable than that of para -position cyclization transition states ( TS1 B and TS1 B ′ ), while in the interaction energy (Δ E int ) they are quite the reverse, suggesting that the Δ E int would be responsible for the regioselectivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the rapid development of theoretical methods, the computation has become an essential condition to clarify the structure and properties of molecules as well as the reaction mechanism. In particular, the density functional theory (DFT) calculations have been proved to be a valuable tool in the exploration of the reaction mechanism from the microscopic molecular and atomic levels. In prior years, there were many computational studies for the typical C–H activation and the formations of C–C and C-heteroatom bonds. Zhang et al carried out the DFT calculations to elucidate the palladium-catalyzed chemoselective C­(sp 3 )–H and C­(sp 2 )–H activation/amidation reactions of carbamoyl chloride . They found the more favored mechanism of C­(sp 3 )–H bond activation than C­(sp 2 )–H bond activation was due to the higher acidity of the benzylic C­(sp 3 )–H bond in this system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%