1993
DOI: 10.1016/0098-1354(93)80027-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational issues in nonlinear predictive control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We will then focus on the details required to obtain the next manipulated variable move (prediction step). A comparison of possible methods to solve the prediction equations is provided by Sistu et al [7]. A discussion of many issues in NMPC is provided by Bequette [2].…”
Section: Mpc Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will then focus on the details required to obtain the next manipulated variable move (prediction step). A comparison of possible methods to solve the prediction equations is provided by Sistu et al [7]. A discussion of many issues in NMPC is provided by Bequette [2].…”
Section: Mpc Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In implementation, this involves linearizing the nonlinear model at every sampling instant. Sistu et al [7] have discussed the computational issues in using a full nonlinear model as compared to using a linearized model, in the prediction phase. For the drug delivery model, this is not straightforward because of the different time scales associated with the hemodynamic and pharmacodynamic states.…”
Section: Linearizing the Nonlinear Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of this approach is that a nonlinear model predictive controller is constructed through several local linear model predictive controllers which usually have analytical solutions. Hence, the control actions of this nonlinear model predictive controller can be obtained analytically avoiding the time consuming numerical search procedures and the uncertainty in convergence to the global optimum which are typically seen in conventional nonlinear model based predictive control strategies [6,30,31].…”
Section: Neuro-fuzzy Network Model-based Predictive Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integration of the model from time step k-1 to current time step k is represented by: since the states are not corrected with feedback measurements. A detailed comparison of the computation times for the various implementation strategies, including different optimization codes and numerical integrators, is performed by Sistu et al (1993). There are signifi cant computational savings to the NLQDMC approach of Garcia (1984), particularly if analytical derivatives are used to in the model linearization.…”
Section: Model Predictive Control Using Fundamental Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%