2000
DOI: 10.1021/ed077p203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Investigations for Undergraduate Organic Chemistry: Modeling a TLC Exercise to Investigate Molecular Structure and Intermolecular Forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many excellent laboratory activities and demonstrations require students to use hydrogen bonding and intermolecular force concepts to solve problems (17)(18)(19)(20). However, little concrete evidence is provided to document how these activities improve student understanding.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many excellent laboratory activities and demonstrations require students to use hydrogen bonding and intermolecular force concepts to solve problems (17)(18)(19)(20). However, little concrete evidence is provided to document how these activities improve student understanding.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9,10] The polarity of the solvent is determined by the intermolecular forces in the solution system, which could be either nonspecific forces (ex: directional force, induced force, dispersion force) or specific forces (ex: hydrogen bond binding force, electron pair acceptor and donor interaction). [11][12][13] As they occur in the solvated shell of the solute, which is comparatively different than that in the solvent body, it belongs to molecular microscopic interaction. [14][15][16] While defining the above three physical constants, the assumed solvation electrostatic model does not consider the specific force, and therefore, it is not ideal to relate the molecular polarity with macroscopic physical quantities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, parameters such as dipole moment (μ), dielectric constant (ϵ) and refractive index ( n ) are used to characterize and quantitatively describe the polarity of the solvent [9,10] . The polarity of the solvent is determined by the intermolecular forces in the solution system, which could be either non‐specific forces (ex: directional force, induced force, dispersion force) or specific forces (ex: hydrogen bond binding force, electron pair acceptor and donor interaction) [11–13] . As they occur in the solvated shell of the solute, which is comparatively different than that in the solvent body, it belongs to molecular microscopic interaction [14–16] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the chromatography portion of Exercise 2, each student injects a pure liquid and a mixture of liquids into the GC using a needle-dip technique. 5 Retention times on the GC are recorded and compared to the dipole moments calculated on the computer and to boiling point data (16). Although only one molecular property (boiling point) is examined in this exercise (17), the importance of hydrogen bonding as an intermolecular force is made very clear.…”
Section: W For Introductory Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sequence expands upon students' knowledge of bonding and VSEPR (valence shell electron pair repulsion) structures to build and submit semi-empirical calculations to MacSpartanPlus (1) 1 ; uses the results to examine molecular shape, dipole moments, and intermolecular forces when coupled with a gas chromatography laboratory exercise; and finishes with an exploration of molecular orbitals. Earlier reports of computational exercises throughout the undergraduate curriculum (2)(3)(4) most often focus on upper-level physical and inorganic chemistry courses with "early" inclusion emphasizing the sophomore-level organic course (5)(6)(7). When these reports have involved first-year courses, the use of modeling software has been limited to viewing molecules and properties without incorporating the build-and-calculate stages required by the method (8) with only a few exceptions (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%