2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.10.136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational investigation of hydrogen storage on scandium–acetylene system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optimization of the usable capacity for typical fixed operating pressures of 5 and 100 bar gives an optimal value for the Gibbs free energy of adsorption (Δ G ads ). Assuming a correlation between enthalpy and entropy of adsorption in porous materials gives a range of −15 to −25 kJ/mol for the optimal value for enthalpy of adsorption (Δ H ads ). The internal energy of binding, which is the largest component of Δ H ads , can be computed using different quantum chemistry methods, including, but not limited to, density functional theory (DFT), ,,, Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), and different variants of coupled-cluster theory. Each of these methods have different accuracies and computational costs associated with them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization of the usable capacity for typical fixed operating pressures of 5 and 100 bar gives an optimal value for the Gibbs free energy of adsorption (Δ G ads ). Assuming a correlation between enthalpy and entropy of adsorption in porous materials gives a range of −15 to −25 kJ/mol for the optimal value for enthalpy of adsorption (Δ H ads ). The internal energy of binding, which is the largest component of Δ H ads , can be computed using different quantum chemistry methods, including, but not limited to, density functional theory (DFT), ,,, Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), and different variants of coupled-cluster theory. Each of these methods have different accuracies and computational costs associated with them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13] The internal energy of binding, which is the largest component of ∆H ads , can be computed using different quantum chemistry methods, including, but not limited to, density functional theory (DFT), 9,10,14,15 Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), [16][17][18] and different variants of coupled-cluster theory. [19][20][21] Each of these methods have different accuracies and computational costs associated with them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to the computational study in the chemical trapping of dihydrogen, noncovalent interactions must be taken into account [12], given the relatively weak attracting force-mostly dispersive-derived from two neutral molecules, leading to general complexes with formula Z:nH 2 , where Z is a neutral molecule and n is the number of H 2 molecules attached to the Z neutral system. A number of theoretical articles have been devoted to the interaction of dihydrogen with metallic systems [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%