2021
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp05438k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational insights into the role of calcium ions in protein–glycosaminoglycan systems

Abstract: The prediction power of computational methodologies for studying the role of ions in protein–glycosaminoglycan interactions was critically assessed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29,30 GAGs can influence the cell signaling and the activity of the proteins by changing their conformation or by oligomerization facilitation of their receptors by binding and clustering multiple fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) simultaneously. 31,32 In the context of the protein−GAG interaction, several computational approaches, like docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, were used to predict the binding sites on the protein 33−36 and the interaction of GAGs with several proteins like VEGF, 25 IL10, 34,37,38 acidic fibroblast growth factor, 26 protein−ion−GAG complexes, 39 etc.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30 GAGs can influence the cell signaling and the activity of the proteins by changing their conformation or by oligomerization facilitation of their receptors by binding and clustering multiple fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) simultaneously. 31,32 In the context of the protein−GAG interaction, several computational approaches, like docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, were used to predict the binding sites on the protein 33−36 and the interaction of GAGs with several proteins like VEGF, 25 IL10, 34,37,38 acidic fibroblast growth factor, 26 protein−ion−GAG complexes, 39 etc.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selectivity of the binding poses was calculated using method proposed by Siebenmorgen et al . [42] and described in details in our previous work [43] . The only modification of this approach applied here consisted of considering best scored pose as a reference for “correct” docking results since there are no reference experimental structures available.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following studies successfully investigated effects of the GAGs binding on a variety of different proteins, such as CXCL-14, 11 VEGF, 7 CXCL-8, 9 , 24 , 28 a Proliferation Inducing Ligand (APRIL), 29 IL-10, 25 , 26 , 30 CXCL-12, 31 acidic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-1), 32 or protein–ion–GAG complexes. 33 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many computational studies on GAGs show their promising potential in the examination of the protein–GAG interactions. The following studies successfully investigated effects of the GAGs binding on a variety of different proteins, such as CXCL-14, VEGF, CXCL-8, ,, a Proliferation Inducing Ligand (APRIL), IL-10, ,, CXCL-12, acidic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-1), or protein–ion–GAG complexes …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation