2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2018.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational insight into the phthalocyanine-DNA binding via docking and molecular dynamics simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more positive value indicates a better binding, whereas a negative number indicates very weak binding, but not nonbinding. Similar data utilizing YASARA can also be found in the studies by Dulebo et al 37 and Ozalp et al 38 Thus, it is very similar to the MM/PBSA method, 39,40 except for the entropy term, which can be neglected in the context of the main goal of these calculations, where we compare ligand binding affinities for the same ligand in different binding sites and any error will be carried through all numbers.…”
Section: Binding Energysupporting
confidence: 61%
“…A more positive value indicates a better binding, whereas a negative number indicates very weak binding, but not nonbinding. Similar data utilizing YASARA can also be found in the studies by Dulebo et al 37 and Ozalp et al 38 Thus, it is very similar to the MM/PBSA method, 39,40 except for the entropy term, which can be neglected in the context of the main goal of these calculations, where we compare ligand binding affinities for the same ligand in different binding sites and any error will be carried through all numbers.…”
Section: Binding Energysupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The major reason for this is that the contact of compound ( 3–5 ) is very large; as the contact surface of the molecules increases, the biological activity value may increase. [ 55,56 ] Increased contact surface of molecules increases the interaction between molecules and proteins. These interactions are hydrogen bonds, polar and hydrophobic interactions, and π–π and halogen bonds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best binding free energies obtained for each region were also used for the calculation of Boltzmann‐averaged binding energies (ΔG ba ) by means of the Boltzmann distribution equation (Equation ), where the number 5 represents each binding region of enzyme. [ 68 ] Δ G ba were utilized to calculate binding constants using the following Equation : K b = exp[−Δ G ba / RT ], where R is the gas constant and T = 298 K. Gbagoodbreak=i=15eGi/kTi=150.25emeGi/italickTGi0.25em …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%