2021
DOI: 10.1002/nag.3311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational implementation of bounding surface model and its verification through cavity benchmark problems

Abstract: This paper develops an implicit integration algorithm for a general form of the bounding surface model, using the return mapping approach (elastic predictor‐plastic corrector), to obtain the updated stresses for given strain increments. The formulation of the constitutive integration requires the derivation of a supplementary differential equation to describe the evolution of a key variable, that is, the ratio between the image stress and the current stress quantities. The integration algorithm for the boundin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for other excavation problems such as wellbore drilling (Chen and Abousleiman 2016;Chen and Abousleiman 2017;Chen S et al 2022). Then the internal support pressure gradually reduces from h0…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for other excavation problems such as wellbore drilling (Chen and Abousleiman 2016;Chen and Abousleiman 2017;Chen S et al 2022). Then the internal support pressure gradually reduces from h0…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kossa and Szabó [27] proposed a novel precise stress integration strategy based on the combined linear hardening von Mises elastoplastic model, which is implemented in ABAQUS through its UMAT material interface. Some researchers [28][29][30][31][32] have also used the UMAT material interface in ABAQUS to numerically implement the existing model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%