2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational image reconstruction for multi-frequency diffuse optical tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of practical reconstruction algorithms have been developed in tomography to implement the process of reconstructing a 3D object from a projection [16]. These algorithms are mainly based on the mathematics of statistical knowledge of the data acquisition process and the geometry of the data imaging system [17].…”
Section: Inverse Model Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A variety of practical reconstruction algorithms have been developed in tomography to implement the process of reconstructing a 3D object from a projection [16]. These algorithms are mainly based on the mathematics of statistical knowledge of the data acquisition process and the geometry of the data imaging system [17].…”
Section: Inverse Model Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Input: set the initial guess μ s 0 ; Regularization parameters α > 0, β > 0; d 0 ¼ b 0 d ¼ 0 and margins of error ε. 17) to be acquired μ k s ;…”
Section: Spilt Bregman Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used 15 combinations of frequencies and found that the best imaging performance was from the combination of all four modulation frequencies. Then in 2021, Mudeng et al [ 22 ] and Shifa et al [ 23 ] also simulated HD-DOT on a 2D circular model, using 3 frequencies, 100 MHz, 150 MHz and 200 MHz and found that mFD measurements of 100 MHz + 150 MHz and 100 MHz + 150 MHz + 200 MHz performed similarly to that of 200 MHz alone. Shifa et al used frequencies between 100 MHz to 1000 MHz, however they only analysed up to 700 MHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three modulation frequencies will be used of 78.125 (78) MHz, 140.625 (141) MHz and 203.125 (203) MHz, which are the same as the simulated mFD-HD-DOT evaluation as seen in Perkins et al [ 24 ] . The use of 3 frequencies is more than sufficient to observe the benefits of mFD and the difference between the 3 frequencies is such that there is a sufficient difference in data between the frequencies (Intes et al [ 17 ], Burcin Unlu et al [ 18 ], Chen et al [ 21 ] and Mudeng et al [ 22 ] .).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%