The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2019.01028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Hyperspectral Imaging Based on Dimension-Discriminative Low-Rank Tensor Recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also apply the ADMM by introducing the auxiliary variables D = Z and M = Z to split the optimization problem in (28) to several easy sub-problems.…”
Section: B Updating Target Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also apply the ADMM by introducing the auxiliary variables D = Z and M = Z to split the optimization problem in (28) to several easy sub-problems.…”
Section: B Updating Target Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though these methods were based on the tensor decomposition and also explored other characteristics such as low-rank, sparse and non-local properties, they have not considered the joint correlations exist in the HSIs. Very recently, Zhang et al proposed a dimension-discriminative low-rank tensor recovery (DLTR) model for computational hyperspectral imaging [28]. They constructed several third-order tensors and claimed that the three modes of the tensor represent the spatial self-similarity, spectral correlation and the joint correlation respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In machine learning, tensor learning is widely used in hyperspectral classification and dimensionality reduction [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. It has been applied to the latest hyperspectral imaging techniques [ 19 ]. Tensor learning uses prior information to calculate the image reconstruction in hyperspectral imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational imaging systems are usually compact and have more spectral bands than direct imaging systems. However, because of the massive computational requirements to reconstruct spectral images [ 29 , 30 , 31 ], computational imaging systems cannot display the full-resolution datacube in real time, thus preventing their application in time-crucial projects. Thus, a snapshot imaging spectrometer meeting the conditions of simple implementation, low computational complexity, and high reconstruction performance is of great research value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%