2013
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2012.2237546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Homogenization for Laminated Ferromagnetic Cores in Magnetodynamics

Abstract: In this paper, we investigate the modeling of ferromagnetic multiscale materials. We propose a computational homogenization technique based on the heterogeneous multiscale method (HMM) that includes both eddy-current and hysteretic losses at the mesoscale. The HMM comprises: 1) a macroscale problem that captures the slow variations of the overall solution; 2) many mesoscale problems that allow to determine the constitutive law at the macroscale. As application example, a laminated iron core is considered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer to [40,41] for multiscale simulations of the magnetostatics and magnetodynamics of such iron cores. Setting.…”
Section: Simulation Of a Laminated Iron Corementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We refer to [40,41] for multiscale simulations of the magnetostatics and magnetodynamics of such iron cores. Setting.…”
Section: Simulation Of a Laminated Iron Corementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those are the most general hypotheses for the maps A ε under which homogenization for (1) can be established, see [15,18,42]. Many physical processes can be modeled by parabolic partial differential equations (PDEs) of the form (1), e.g., non-Newtonian fluids, ferromagnetic materials or composites with nonlinear materials, see [12,41]. Using standard numerical methods, like the finite element method (FEM), to discretize the problem (1) in space leads to high computational cost as the small scale ε of the spatial heterogeneities of A ε has to be resolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K is the numerically homogenized map defined in (35). In particular, in the a priori error estimates of Theorems 4.3 and 4.4 the upscaling error is quantified by e HM M given by…”
Section: Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the numerically homogenized nonlinear map A 0,h k is given by (35). We note that the terms (51a) and (51b) can be bounded using Lemma 5.3.…”
Section: Proof Of the A Priori Error Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation