2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational finite element bone mechanics accurately predicts mechanical competence in the human radius of an elderly population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
100
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
100
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a follow-up study using the same 0.007 effective strain threshold for element failure, a nonlinear relationship was observed for critical failure volume (0.1-50% of model volume) versus the error between predicted and experimentally measured strength of embalmed human distal radii, which were scanned at a nominal resolution of 89 mm (compared with 165 mm from the previous study) with a lower tissue modulus of 6.829 GPa. 19 Like the present study involving mouse VBs, these studies found that the optimum failure volume for a homogeneous material definition was between 1 and 10%. 18,19 Conceivably, for any given study, there is an optimum failure volume and an optimum failure strain that maximizes R 2 and minimizes RMSE, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a follow-up study using the same 0.007 effective strain threshold for element failure, a nonlinear relationship was observed for critical failure volume (0.1-50% of model volume) versus the error between predicted and experimentally measured strength of embalmed human distal radii, which were scanned at a nominal resolution of 89 mm (compared with 165 mm from the previous study) with a lower tissue modulus of 6.829 GPa. 19 Like the present study involving mouse VBs, these studies found that the optimum failure volume for a homogeneous material definition was between 1 and 10%. 18,19 Conceivably, for any given study, there is an optimum failure volume and an optimum failure strain that maximizes R 2 and minimizes RMSE, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…19 Like the present study involving mouse VBs, these studies found that the optimum failure volume for a homogeneous material definition was between 1 and 10%. 18,19 Conceivably, for any given study, there is an optimum failure volume and an optimum failure strain that maximizes R 2 and minimizes RMSE, respectively. However, the data presented here demonstrate that achieving this optimum is not essential to detect group-wise differences in whole-bone strength that are greater than 20% ( Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[16][17][18] Stiffness, apparent modulus, cortical compartment load fraction and failure load estimate were computed for each model.…”
Section: Q4 Fes-rowing Attenuates Bone Loss In Sci Rs Gibbons Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 We therefore posit that nonlinear μFEA might be a more powerful tool to predict fracture risk. 21,[25][26][27][28] A few studies showed the ability of nonlinear μFEA to predict tensile and compressive yield properties of bone. 23,28,29 However, there is little work aimed at predicting trabecular bone post-yield behavior through nonlinear analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%