2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational evaluation of malignant tissue apoptosis in magnetic hyperthermia considering intratumoral injection strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5e) is employed to evaluate the magnetic field, anticipate the temperature distribution, and estimate the damaged fraction of biological tissue during magnetic hyperthermia treatment. The treatment temperature distribution in the biological tissue of the proposed physical model can be accurately predicted by solving Pennes’ bio-heat transfer equation 71 (eqn (S11) and (S12)†). Details of the simulation parameters and model are presented in the Experimental section of the ESI †.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5e) is employed to evaluate the magnetic field, anticipate the temperature distribution, and estimate the damaged fraction of biological tissue during magnetic hyperthermia treatment. The treatment temperature distribution in the biological tissue of the proposed physical model can be accurately predicted by solving Pennes’ bio-heat transfer equation 71 (eqn (S11) and (S12)†). Details of the simulation parameters and model are presented in the Experimental section of the ESI †.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 4.1 shows that the PBHT model does not consider important cooling mechanisms, so the results with PBHT considering TBPR may show the best results with a fixed power dissipation, but the results are not a good representation of what happens in practice. In this section, we analyze what happens when the other three cases consider their respective power dissipation to reach a critical maximum temperature inside tumor region by using the method proposed in [38]. The power dissipations of MNPs are 1.45 × 10 6 W m −3 for figure 5(a), 3.14 × 10 6 W m −3 for figure 5(b), 1.33 × 10 6 W m −3 for figure 5(c), and 3.07 × 10 6 W m −3 for figure 5(d).…”
Section: Treatment Temperature Distributions For Different Bio-heat T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,5] However, the treatment temperature distribution inside the tumor region should be determined by many factors, and the most two important elements are the power dissipation for magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) and the nanofluid concentration distribution inside the tumor region. [6,7] The heat dissipated by the MNPs is primarily determined by the characteristics of the applied magnetic field and MNPs. [8,9] The concentration distribution depends on the delivery approaches for nanofluid, which can generally be intratumoural injection and systematic delivery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%