2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55573-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational discovery of hidden breaks in 28S ribosomal RNAs across eukaryotes and consequences for RNA Integrity Numbers

Abstract: In some eukaryotes, a ‘hidden break’ has been described in which the 28S ribosomal RNA molecule is cleaved into two subparts. The break is common in protostome animals (arthropods, molluscs, annelids etc.), but a break has also been reported in some vertebrates and non-metazoan eukaryotes. We present a new computational approach to determine the presence of the hidden break in 28S rRNAs using mapping of RNA-Seq data. We find a homologous break is present across protostomes although it has been lost in a small … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(66 reference statements)
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One caveat of this measurement is that it is based on a Bayesian learning approach, and the samples used to train this algorithm were exclusively vertebrate [ 53 ]. As a result, the Bioanalyzer software sometimes fails to calculate RIN values of non-vertebrate samples as the peak shapes do not match training sets [ 53 , 54 ]. Moreover, a phenomenon known as the “hidden break” in the 28S ribosomal RNA causes it to break in two pieces of approximately the same size as the 18S [ 55 , 56 ], causing a sharp decrease in the RIN value of the sample that is not due to RNA degradation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One caveat of this measurement is that it is based on a Bayesian learning approach, and the samples used to train this algorithm were exclusively vertebrate [ 53 ]. As a result, the Bioanalyzer software sometimes fails to calculate RIN values of non-vertebrate samples as the peak shapes do not match training sets [ 53 , 54 ]. Moreover, a phenomenon known as the “hidden break” in the 28S ribosomal RNA causes it to break in two pieces of approximately the same size as the 18S [ 55 , 56 ], causing a sharp decrease in the RIN value of the sample that is not due to RNA degradation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a phenomenon known as the “hidden break” in the 28S ribosomal RNA causes it to break in two pieces of approximately the same size as the 18S [ 55 , 56 ], causing a sharp decrease in the RIN value of the sample that is not due to RNA degradation. This is triggered by denaturation, heating, or chemicals [ 55 , 56 ] and has been described to be widely present in platyhelminthes, including Schmidtea mediterranea , and many other animal groups [ 54 ]. As a result, RIN numbers of ACME samples are never above 8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protostomes have 12 unique microRNA families ( 13 ) compared with 1 in deuterostomes, and protostomes share 58 “near intron pairs” compared with only 7 in deuterostomes. Protostomes also share a highly distinct, conserved variant of the mitochondrial NAD5 protein ( 14 ) and a hidden break in their 28 S ribosomal RNA ( 15 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RNA integrity number (RIN) score was not able to be calculated due to the lack of 28S RNA-associated peak on electropherograms of L. stagnalis RNA. This phenomenon occurs due to a thermolabile hidden break in the molecule, as described in various invertebrates, which leads to its cleavage into two sub-parts of size similar to that of 18S RNA [ 100 ]. For this reason, RNA quality was evaluated using the global shape of migration profiles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%