2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18099-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational detection and quantification of human and mouse neutrophil extracellular traps in flow cytometry and confocal microscopy

Abstract: Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are extracellular defense mechanisms used by neutrophils, where chromatin is expelled together with histones and granular/cytoplasmic proteins. They have become an immunology hotspot, implicated in infections, but also in a diverse array of diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, diabetes, and cancer. However, the precise assessment of in vivo relevance in different disease settings has been hampered by limited tools to quantify occurrence of extracellular traps in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
27
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to this study, two previous studies using imaging flow cytometry failed to identify NETs in solution, although they were able to identify potential precursors to NETs, that is, cells with decondensed nuclei and morphological changes thought to be related NET formation . An additional study used imaging flow cytometry to identify what look to be DNA strands attached to whole cells . Unfortunately, due to the lack of a brightfield image and NET protein markers, it is difficult to confirm if these are truly NETs or some kind of artifact produced during cell preparation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…In contrast to this study, two previous studies using imaging flow cytometry failed to identify NETs in solution, although they were able to identify potential precursors to NETs, that is, cells with decondensed nuclei and morphological changes thought to be related NET formation . An additional study used imaging flow cytometry to identify what look to be DNA strands attached to whole cells . Unfortunately, due to the lack of a brightfield image and NET protein markers, it is difficult to confirm if these are truly NETs or some kind of artifact produced during cell preparation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Immunocytochemistry and immunohistochemistry are among the most common methods used to detect NETs. 28 Several methods permit NET detection real time in vivo, including live cell imaging, [29][30][31][32] intravital imaging, 10,33 and the use of DNA-intercalating dyes. 34,35 NETs can also be detected ex vivo in fluid secretions, serum, and tissue sections.…”
Section: Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). The use of different methods of detection and quantification of NETs in vitro, in serum and in tissue [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] also impedes interpretation and/or comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%