2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00371-020-01968-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational design of polyomino puzzles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Chen et al presented a computational design method of high-level interlocking puzzles [CWSB22], where multiple moves are required to take out the first subassembly from the puzzle. While those are bottom-up constructive approaches, Kita and Miyata proposed a top-down partitioning approach in designing polyomino puzzles to improve the controllability of the puzzle designers [KM21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Chen et al presented a computational design method of high-level interlocking puzzles [CWSB22], where multiple moves are required to take out the first subassembly from the puzzle. While those are bottom-up constructive approaches, Kita and Miyata proposed a top-down partitioning approach in designing polyomino puzzles to improve the controllability of the puzzle designers [KM21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by recent advances in digital fabrication, the graphics community has raised a great interest in research on computational design for stylized fabrication [Bickel et al 2018]. Among this line of research, a number of computational methods and tools have been developed for personalized design and fabrication of various kinds of geometric puzzles, including 3D jigsaw puzzles [Elber and Kim 2022], polyomino puzzles [Kita and Miyata 2020;Lo et al 2009], dissection puzzles [Duncan et al 2017;Li et al 2018;Tang et al 2019;Zhou and Wang 2012], interlocking puzzles [Song et al 2012;Xin et al 2011], centrifugal puzzles [Kita and Saito 2020], and twisty puzzles that generalize the Rubik's cube mechanism [Sun and Zheng 2015].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%