2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta00338b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational design of cobalt-free mixed proton–electron conductors for solid oxide electrochemical cells

Abstract: Proton-conducting solid-oxide electrolyzer and fuel cells (PC-SOECs/FCs) represent viable, intermediate-temperature green technologies for H2 production and conversion. While PC ceramics have been extensively investigated as electrolytes for PC-SOECs/FCs, the development of corresponding single-phase electrode components has been hindered by difficulties in finding efficient mixed proton-electron conductors (MPECs), with also effective catalytic activity toward oxygen reduction and evolution reactions (ORR/OER… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Density functional theory (DFT) calculations yielded higher proton transfer barriers of 0.5–0.6 eV for BaZr 0.75 Co 0.25 O 3‐ δ compared with BaZrO 3 treated with the same methodology (0.3 eV), but these barriers also include defect association . For BaZr 0.75 Fe 0.25 O 3‐ δ and BaZr 0.75 Mn 0.25 O 3‐ δ , slightly decreased proton migration barriers of about 0.2 eV were found compared with BaZrO 3 for configurations in which the initial as well as final proton position is located between one Zr and one Fe/Mn (i.e., absence of defect association effects) . For Sr 2 Fe 1.5 Mo 0.5 O 6‐ δ and Ba 0.25 Sr 1.75 Fe 1.5 Mo 0.5 O 6‐ δ double perovskites, proton migration barriers of 0.5 and 0.3–0.4 eV have been obtained from DFT calculations .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Density functional theory (DFT) calculations yielded higher proton transfer barriers of 0.5–0.6 eV for BaZr 0.75 Co 0.25 O 3‐ δ compared with BaZrO 3 treated with the same methodology (0.3 eV), but these barriers also include defect association . For BaZr 0.75 Fe 0.25 O 3‐ δ and BaZr 0.75 Mn 0.25 O 3‐ δ , slightly decreased proton migration barriers of about 0.2 eV were found compared with BaZrO 3 for configurations in which the initial as well as final proton position is located between one Zr and one Fe/Mn (i.e., absence of defect association effects) . For Sr 2 Fe 1.5 Mo 0.5 O 6‐ δ and Ba 0.25 Sr 1.75 Fe 1.5 Mo 0.5 O 6‐ δ double perovskites, proton migration barriers of 0.5 and 0.3–0.4 eV have been obtained from DFT calculations .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to avoid this problem and to have an understanding about the effect of K-doping on proton mobility, DFT calculations, which have been demonstrated to be a powerful tool for predicting proton migration in oxides in many previous studies, 38,[47][48][49][50] were used to investigate and compare proton migration in BSCF and BKSCF. Figure 3 shows a schematic of the proton migration process, which involves a hopping step and a rotating step.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An effective value of U-J = 4.00 eV has been used for all Co, Ni, and Mn d electrons. This value is an average between the values of Co, Mn, and Ni, reported from ab-initio UHF calculations, and has been recently validated by us for LiMO 2 layered phases (M = Co, Ni, Mn) [44][45][46]. We used a kinetic energy cut-off of 520 eV and Brillouin Zone sampled at the Gamma point.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%