2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational assessment of constraint in total knee replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Values of k depended on the implant surface area represented by each spring node such that k was equal to the area multiplied by 2.568 X 10" N m"^ [36]. The value of b was 200N s m"' [33,36].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values of k depended on the implant surface area represented by each spring node such that k was equal to the area multiplied by 2.568 X 10" N m"^ [36]. The value of b was 200N s m"' [33,36].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The components were aligned at 01, 301, and 901 of femoral flexion. An axial load of 710 N (Haider and Walker, 2005;Moran et al, 2008) was applied to simulate physiological loading levels. Relative AP displacements (+ / À 6.35 mm) or IE rotations (+ / À 101) were applied to the components, and the resulting constraint forces generated were measured.…”
Section: Kinematics Simulation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only unconstrained tibiofemoral degrees of freedom (DOF) were medial -lateral (ML) displacement and adduction -abduction (AA) rotation, provided by a combined sliding/pivoting joint (detailed photograph in Figure 2). Flexion-extension (FE) was fixed at either 08 or 808 of flexion and an axial load of 710 N was applied during all laxity experiments (Haider and Walker 2005;Moran et al 2008). During anterior -posterior (AP) laxity tests, AP displacements (d) were prescribed, whereas internal-external (IE) rotation was fixed at 08.…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational models of experiments to predict TKR kinematics and the influence of design, soft tissue restraint or friction were developed, primarily simulating simple laxity tests (Essinger et al 1989;Garg and Walker 1990;Sathasivam and Walker 1997;Godest et al 2000;Moran et al 2008). Although earlier studies relied on graphical or in-house codes, more recent studies opt to use commercially available multibody analysis software such as MSC.Adams (MSC.Software Corp., Santa Ana, CA, USA) to simulate TKR kinematics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%