2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00791-006-0047-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational aspects of the stochastic finite element method

Abstract: Abstract. We present an overview of the stochastic finite element method with an emphasis on the computational tasks involved in its implementation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of interest are applications related to e.g. steady or unsteady simulations of nonlinear equations [7] or stochastic finite element methods [12,33] in three dimensions where variable preconditioning using approximate solvers has to be usually considered. We also note that when all right-hand sides are available simultaneously and when the matrix is fixed, block subspace methods may be also suitable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of interest are applications related to e.g. steady or unsteady simulations of nonlinear equations [7] or stochastic finite element methods [12,33] in three dimensions where variable preconditioning using approximate solvers has to be usually considered. We also note that when all right-hand sides are available simultaneously and when the matrix is fixed, block subspace methods may be also suitable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assembly of an H 2 -matrix costs O(n log n) operations. The vector a (0) m solves a discretized version of the KL integral eigenproblem (5) and can be computed with O(n log n) complexity as outlined in [2]. In summary, then, approximations to each component of the gradient ∇a m of KL eigenfunctions can be obtained with O(n log n) complexity; thus computing ∇a (M ) costs O(n log n) operations.…”
Section: Differentiation Of Karhunen-loève Eigenfunctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assess the quality of the expansions ∇a (M ) and ∇ (M ) a by computing the quantities ∇a (M ) 2 = M m=1 λ m ∇a m 2 and ∇ (M ) a 2 = M m=1 γ m , and comparing these with the total variance of ∇a, ∇a 2 2 , then ∇a (M ) converges to ∇a in the m.-s. sense uniformly on D for M → ∞. 3 Thus, for sufficiently smooth covariance functions ∇a (M ) converges to ∇a in the same sense as the truncated KL expansion ∇ (M ) a does (see, e.g., [8,Chapter 10]).…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations