2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2007.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational aspects of monotone dualization: A brief survey

Abstract: Dualization of a monotone Boolean function represented by a conjunctive normal form (CNF) is a problem which, in different disguise, is ubiquitous in many areas including Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Game Theory to mention some of them. It is also one of the few problems whose precise tractability status (in terms of polynomial-time solvability) is still unknown, and now open for more than 25 years. In this paper, we briefly survey computational results for this problem, where we focus on the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
101
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(172 reference statements)
2
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [5,7] the author give quasi-polynomial time algorithms for the following cases: each P i is a join semi-lattice of bounded width (any antichain has constant size), each P i is a forest poset in which either the in-degree or the out-degree of each element is constant (see also [6]), each P i is the lattice of intervals defined by a set of intervals on the real line R. In [5,7] a more general dualization problem was stated where each P i is a lattice (with no bounds on its width), the existence of quasipolynomial time algorithms for this case is still an open question. In this paper we prove an upper bound complexity of the latter problem via another long-standing open complexity problem, the minimum implication base (see [2], equivalently SID problem from [21,4]). The most common technique leading to quasi-polynomial time algorithm for duality problems are based on the idea of high frequency based decomposition, first introduced in [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [5,7] the author give quasi-polynomial time algorithms for the following cases: each P i is a join semi-lattice of bounded width (any antichain has constant size), each P i is a forest poset in which either the in-degree or the out-degree of each element is constant (see also [6]), each P i is the lattice of intervals defined by a set of intervals on the real line R. In [5,7] a more general dualization problem was stated where each P i is a lattice (with no bounds on its width), the existence of quasipolynomial time algorithms for this case is still an open question. In this paper we prove an upper bound complexity of the latter problem via another long-standing open complexity problem, the minimum implication base (see [2], equivalently SID problem from [21,4]). The most common technique leading to quasi-polynomial time algorithm for duality problems are based on the idea of high frequency based decomposition, first introduced in [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the dualization on lattices given by implication bases for distributive lattices is polynomially equivalent to the dualization on lattices given by contexts (ordered sets of irreducible elements), which we study in the next section. The study of dualization problems for lattices given by implication bases is motivated by simple linear-time reciprocal translations of implications to functional dependencies [18] and propositional Horn theories [4].…”
Section: Dualizing Monotone Boolean Functions On Latticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The enumeration of minimal geometric hitting sets, as the ones described above, arises in various areas such as computational geometry, machine learning, and data mining [14]. Moreover, our efficient enumeration algorithm might be useful, for example, in developing exact algorithms, fixed-parameter tractable algorithms, and polynomial-time approximation schemes for the corresponding optimization problems (see, e.g., [22]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is witnessed by the fact that these problems are cited in a rapidly growing body of literature and have been referenced in various survey papers and complexity theory retrospectives, e.g. [12,14,21,29,30,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%