2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational approaches in viral ecology

Abstract: Graphical abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vigneron et al found that these (putative host) groups were among the most abundant in the summer [ 17 ]. However, the validity of this approach to identifying host groups and assigning taxonomy is questionable as it is unable to account for the mosaicism of viral genomes and assumes a common origin for viruses that may have arisen independently [ 62 ]. In addition, most of the UViGs from this study have deep branches indicating a distant homology with classified viruses which is likely a reflection of the paucity of viruses in the database when compared to the true viral diversity, and the novelty of the viruses in thermokarst lakes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vigneron et al found that these (putative host) groups were among the most abundant in the summer [ 17 ]. However, the validity of this approach to identifying host groups and assigning taxonomy is questionable as it is unable to account for the mosaicism of viral genomes and assumes a common origin for viruses that may have arisen independently [ 62 ]. In addition, most of the UViGs from this study have deep branches indicating a distant homology with classified viruses which is likely a reflection of the paucity of viruses in the database when compared to the true viral diversity, and the novelty of the viruses in thermokarst lakes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the current pandemic and until now, many virus detection techniques have been extensively utilized. These methods include amplifying and sequencing virus-related genes coding, particularly pathogenic proteins [ 19 , 20 ], detecting the virus in host cells lysates [ 21 ], etc. However, these approaches have certain drawbacks that limit their usage as routine point-of-care tests.…”
Section: Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of characterizing MGE diversity presents two major challenges: (i) accurate and sensitive detection of MGEs, and (ii) MGE classification. An increasingly large number of tools have been developed to search genomic sequence data for putative MGEs using distinct computational approaches (18). Each of these individual approaches to MGE prediction has advantages and limitations.…”
Section: Importance Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome alignment tools identify all non-core genomic elements, which include MGEs but can also include other accessory genomic features, such as recombination hotspots (20), cell surface modification loci (20,21), and CRISPR-Cas systems (22). Machine learning and deep learning-based tools may require large dataset inputs or customized training data, which may not be available for most microbial systems (18,23,24). Furthermore, MGE identification is most thoroughly tested on clinically-relevant and well-studied host microbes, especially those in the phylum Proteobacteria (19,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27), and is largely tailored to identifying integrated viruses (i.e., prophages), neglecting the numerous other types of MGEs (18,28).…”
Section: Importance Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation