2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-0331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational and Experimental Study of Plume and Shock Interaction Effects on Sonic Boom in the NASA Ames 9x7 Supersonic Wind Tunnel

Abstract: A wind tunnel test was performed in the NASA Ames 9x7 Supersonic Wind Tunnel focusing on the shock waves traveling through and interacting with an exhaust nozzle plume. This experimental study was conducted to develop and validate the CFD capability required to accurately include nozzle flow with impinging shock effects on near field and ground-propagated sonic boom signatures. The model was made to be generic, and included a simple nozzle shape, two different aft decks, and a few generic horizontal tails. Hig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SBPW3 presents two near-field CFD cases: a shock-plume interaction and a complex, full-aircraft geometry with multiple inflow and outflow boundary conditions. The biconvex case is based on previous NASA wind tunnel tests [21][22][23] and CFD analysis [24,25]. Not coincidentally, the orientation of the wing and nozzle is representative of control surfaces and engine exhaust plumes at the aft end of an aircraft.…”
Section: Near-field Cfdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SBPW3 presents two near-field CFD cases: a shock-plume interaction and a complex, full-aircraft geometry with multiple inflow and outflow boundary conditions. The biconvex case is based on previous NASA wind tunnel tests [21][22][23] and CFD analysis [24,25]. Not coincidentally, the orientation of the wing and nozzle is representative of control surfaces and engine exhaust plumes at the aft end of an aircraft.…”
Section: Near-field Cfdmentioning
confidence: 99%