52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference 2016
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-5008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational and Experimental Evaluation of a Complex Inlet Swirl Pattern Generation System

Abstract: An assessment was conducted to determine the suitability of subscale, low-Mach-number, particle image velocimetry (PIV) testing and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis to evaluate swirling flow downstream of a swirl pattern generation system composed of continuous patterns of turning vanes. Successful demonstration of the evaluation methods required acceptable comparison of the PIV and CFD to an independent five-hole probe measurement performed at the design Mach number and full-scale geometry. The foc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The similarities of the small-scale flow with the full-scale experiment indicate that there are no further physics that need to be described for the higher Reynolds number flow that is far enough upstream of the engine fan face and outside of the duct inner-diameter boundary layer. This has also been previously observed by Sanders et al [30] for a more complex StreamVane pattern, and compared to computational fluid dynamics results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The similarities of the small-scale flow with the full-scale experiment indicate that there are no further physics that need to be described for the higher Reynolds number flow that is far enough upstream of the engine fan face and outside of the duct inner-diameter boundary layer. This has also been previously observed by Sanders et al [30] for a more complex StreamVane pattern, and compared to computational fluid dynamics results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The full-scale StreamVane seem to overshoot the higher angles, relative to the small-scale flow angles, but since the near-wall data was filtered for the small-scale experiment, this cannot be verified. The overall shape of the distortion distribution is maintained across scales, as shown previously for more complex geometries by Guimarães et al [29] and Sanders et al [30]. Most of the other regions of the radius seem to agree well across scales, mainly when taking into account the uncertainty of the measurements (plots for the same values with error bars are presented in the Appendix).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The StreamVane has been shown versatile and effective in generating complex distortion profiles, as the HWB profile presented in this work, single vortex distortions [25], and twin vortex distortions [19,26,27]. It is important, however, to acknowledge that it is a device added to the inlet of the engine, and its influence to the flow needs to be analyzed to ensure that possible adverse effects to the flow are minimized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the StreamVane TM technology [13,17] is used to generate a distortion profile inspired by the base distortion features of an extreme flight condition for an experimental design of a HWB engine inlet. Prior findings on StreamVane aerodynamics indicate that the dominant secondary flow dynamics are Reynolds number independent [17,18], and that the generation of the distortions is Mach number independent until vanes choke [19]. For low-speed small scale wind tunnel experiments of single vortex distortions, secondary flow development is well-predicted by inviscid dynamics of axial vorticity [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%