48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational and Experimental Comparison of a Powered Lift, Upper Surface Blowing Configuration

Abstract: This paper demonstrates the use of CFD as a validation tool for wind tunnel data on 2D high lift airfoil with a 3D engine performed by Georgia Tech Research Institute. Results of this validation will assist in determining the appropriate turbulence models, boundary conditions, mesh characteristics and other CFD modeling techniques necessary to capture the complicated flow physics associated with the coupling of circulation control wings and engine exhaust flows. It was found that grid issues and the two-equati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The realizable k-ε turbulence model was chosen over the one-equation Spalart-Allmaras 57,61,94 and two-equation k-ω 95 models because of its ability to capture features of turbulence with a high quality near-wall mesh, 55 and being commonly used and robust. 51 Although one-and two-equation turbulence models have been shown to typically overpredict the lift coefficients of airfoils in CC flows, 50,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59]61,80,81,83 the chosen model has shown benefits over other models in parametric studies and has been proven to consistently depict aerodynamic trends of CC flow features. 96 The over-prediction of lift is caused by over-predicting turbulent kinetic energy 56…”
Section: Turbulence Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The realizable k-ε turbulence model was chosen over the one-equation Spalart-Allmaras 57,61,94 and two-equation k-ω 95 models because of its ability to capture features of turbulence with a high quality near-wall mesh, 55 and being commonly used and robust. 51 Although one-and two-equation turbulence models have been shown to typically overpredict the lift coefficients of airfoils in CC flows, 50,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59]61,80,81,83 the chosen model has shown benefits over other models in parametric studies and has been proven to consistently depict aerodynamic trends of CC flow features. 96 The over-prediction of lift is caused by over-predicting turbulent kinetic energy 56…”
Section: Turbulence Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By selecting a value well within the super-circulation regime, it ensured that each configuration would not experience jet separation prior to the end of the flap surface leading to a non-biased performance evaluation. Jet separation on the radial surfaces of a CC flap has also been shown to be difficult to predict using CFD [56][57][58][59][81][82][83]. Flap Placement/IntegrationTo place the flap on the airfoil(Figure 3-6a.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%