52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2014
DOI: 10.2514/6.2014-1458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Aerodynamic Analysis for the Formation Flight for Aerodynamic Benefit Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 This was tested because it was used in a few OVERFLOW studies involving full aircraft. 21,22 The dissipation levels were nearly the same as the SA DES case, the time to dispersion just slightly longer than SA DES but still much less than SST DES and SSTV DES. …”
Section: B Inviscid Convecting Vortex Machmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…20 This was tested because it was used in a few OVERFLOW studies involving full aircraft. 21,22 The dissipation levels were nearly the same as the SA DES case, the time to dispersion just slightly longer than SA DES but still much less than SST DES and SSTV DES. …”
Section: B Inviscid Convecting Vortex Machmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A “snapshot” of the velocity distribution at t= 10 seconds is used in the CFD atmosphere of the SoS level to propagate wakes to the entire field. Given the relative location of a leading aircraft, the following aircraft must travel through consecutive sections of the wake while maintaining a safe distance [Halaas et al., ; Slotnick et al., ].…”
Section: Methods Used: Analysis and Optimization Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the tandem wing experiments of Insawa et al, 17 maximum advantage of lift-to-drag ratio was also observed when the wings were overlapped in the spanwise direction. Additionally, a comprehensive multi-fidelity computational analysis of formation flight has been provided by Slotnick et al 18 Most notably, trimmed aerodynamic benefit maps were developed to uncover the best formation positioning for optimal performance, and the Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) computational method coupled with a wake evolution solver was found to yield comparable timeaveraged quantities to flight test data. Despite advances in the basic prediction and demonstration of the benefits of formation flight, significant challenges still exist in the understanding and implications of the unsteady loading and flow structure incurred from formation flight before this technology becomes a viable and safe operational capability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%