1986
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(86)90059-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computation of turbulent supersonic flows around pointed bodies having crossflow separation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models rely on the boundary layer concept, usually incorporating separate formulas for the inner and outer layers, and they require an estimate of a length scale which depends on the thickness of the boundary layer. The estimation of this quantity by a search for a maximum of the vorticity times a distance to the wall, as in the Baldwin-Lomax model, can lead to ambiguities in internal flows, and also in complex vortical flows over slender bodies and highly swept or delta wings [47,125]. The Johnson-King model [98], which allows for non-equilibrium effects through the introduction of an ordinary differential equation for the maximum shear stress, has improved the prediction of flows with shock induced separation [168,101].…”
Section: Turbulence Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models rely on the boundary layer concept, usually incorporating separate formulas for the inner and outer layers, and they require an estimate of a length scale which depends on the thickness of the boundary layer. The estimation of this quantity by a search for a maximum of the vorticity times a distance to the wall, as in the Baldwin-Lomax model, can lead to ambiguities in internal flows, and also in complex vortical flows over slender bodies and highly swept or delta wings [47,125]. The Johnson-King model [98], which allows for non-equilibrium effects through the introduction of an ordinary differential equation for the maximum shear stress, has improved the prediction of flows with shock induced separation [168,101].…”
Section: Turbulence Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-order space accuracy is obtained using the MUSCL, using the primitive variable interpolation. The viscous terms are evaluated by central differencing and the eddy viscosity is modeled by the Baldwin-Lomax turbulence model 13) with Degani-Schiff correction 14) implemented. Only the steady-state solutions are considered, and the LU-ADI factorization time integration algorithm 15) is used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a global maximum value is used, the computed turbulence viscosity might be wrong, because the one needed in this model is the first maximum value of F(n) near the wall. This problem was first analyzed by Degani and Schiff [7]. They found that the behavior of F(n) is different for the attached flow region and the separated flow region.…”
Section: Drawbacks and Modifications Of The B-l Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Goldberg and Chakravarthy [10] proposed an algebraic k -turbulence model in which the inner layer viscosity is evaluated by a new formula instead of the Baldwin-Lomax one. In this study, both Degani and Schiff's [7] and Marx's [8] modifications have been employed.…”
Section: Drawbacks and Modifications Of The B-l Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%