2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computation of TPB length, surface area and pore size from numerical reconstruction of composite solid oxide fuel cell electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
148
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
148
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equations (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) can be used to predict the effective properties of the composite electrode using the mono-particle size distribution of each type of material. Equations (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) can be used to predict the effective properties of the composite electrode using the poly-dispersed particle sizes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Equations (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) can be used to predict the effective properties of the composite electrode using the mono-particle size distribution of each type of material. Equations (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) can be used to predict the effective properties of the composite electrode using the poly-dispersed particle sizes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous paper [17], the validity of Equations (20-23) were carefully checked by comparing the calculated results with computer simulation results that were obtained using the random packing reconstruction model [9].…”
Section: Lscf + Ysz Composite Cathode With Poly-dispersed Particle Sizesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, the effect of the level of grid surface refinement (octree, cut-cell, etc.) on the results is investigated for random porous media with polydisperse particle size distributions available in the literature [40,51].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%