2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2007.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computation of through-space NMR shielding effects in aromatic ring π-stacked complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Structures of the five-membered ring heterocyclic compounds in the study. 1 Previous calculations [28] have shown that basis set superposition error, as measured by the counterpoise method of Boys and Bernardi [34], has a negligible effect on shielding values. BSSE is typically no greater than 0.05 ppm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Structures of the five-membered ring heterocyclic compounds in the study. 1 Previous calculations [28] have shown that basis set superposition error, as measured by the counterpoise method of Boys and Bernardi [34], has a negligible effect on shielding values. BSSE is typically no greater than 0.05 ppm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have reported the results of GIAO-HF calculations to calculate through-space NMR shielding effects on a probe molecule and to map the resulting through-space NMR shielding increments in aromatic ring p-stacked complexes [28]. More recently the computed shielding effects of linear polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [29] and the relationship between the computed shielding effects and the extent of aromaticity have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of single point GIAO calculations was performed in Gaussian 03 [37] on a PQS Linux cluster on these supramolecules using the same method and basis set, moving the H 2 probe in 0.5 Å increments in both the X and Y directions in separate calculations. Previous calculations [38] have shown that basis set superposition error, as measured by the counterpoise method of Boys and Bernardi [39], introduces a negligible effect on shielding values; BSSE is typically no greater than 0.05 ppm. Also, the difference between the shielding values obtained using single point calculations and constrained geometry-optimized calculations is also negligible [31].…”
Section: Computational Sectionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3.96 Å in the solid state). [26][27][28] This is in remarkable contrast to the 1 H NMR spectra observed for the lithiated aryl imines (Li-L 3-8 ). For the lithiated aryl imines, in all cases the two protons of the methylenedioxy unit were found to be equivalent on the solution NMR timescale.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%