1976
DOI: 10.1029/wr012i005p00859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computation of solar radiation from sky cover

Abstract: A procedure for estimating global solar radiation from sky cover is developed from the records of 47 stations in the United States with long periods of radiation observations during the 10-year period, March 1961 through February 1971. It fits a general parabolic equation of the form Y --B + (1 -B)(I -N) P to the observations, where Y is the observed global solar radiation divided by clear sky radiation and N is the sky cover. The variables B (the point at which the parabola crosses the y axis) and P (a variab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We confirmed this result using more recently published [4] long term monthly climatological cloudiness and CampbellStokes averages for Tanzania [5,6]. The conclusion of a large scattering of ground-based observations of monthly averages of point cloudiness plotted against more accurate measurements is in line with results at American stations using Campbell-Stokes data [7] and solarimeters [8]. It is supposed to be due to the nature of sky cover observations, to geometrical differences between measurements of point and areal cloudiness which depend on cloud distributions over the sky and to different detector sensitivities [7,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We confirmed this result using more recently published [4] long term monthly climatological cloudiness and CampbellStokes averages for Tanzania [5,6]. The conclusion of a large scattering of ground-based observations of monthly averages of point cloudiness plotted against more accurate measurements is in line with results at American stations using Campbell-Stokes data [7] and solarimeters [8]. It is supposed to be due to the nature of sky cover observations, to geometrical differences between measurements of point and areal cloudiness which depend on cloud distributions over the sky and to different detector sensitivities [7,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the absence of weather fronts moving across the watershed, the temperature range observed at a given station on a cloudy day will be less than the temperature range observed on a clear-sky day, making temperature range a useful proxy for incoming solar radiation (Tangborn, 1978). The hyperbolic relation between observations of cloud cover and solar radiation established by Thompson (1976) for 43 stations in and around Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, is shown in figure 14. The procedure is applicable to humid regions with variable cloud cover.…”
Section: Incoming Solar Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cre is suggested by Thompson (1976) The estimated incoming solar radiation has a maximum value of radmax(one) fraction of potential incoming solar radiation. The estimated incoming solar radiation is further reduced on days when the average basin precipitation [basin_ppt(one)] exceeds the threshold ppt_rad_adj(nmonths), in inches.…”
Section: Incoming Solar Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model routine used to simulate the initiation, accumulation, and depletion of a snowpack in each HRU (daily computation) was based on the conceptual model of Obled and Rosse (1977). Daily shortwave radiation and sky cover was estimated from maximum and minimum daily air temperatures (Thompson, 1976;Tangborn, 1978).…”
Section: Watershed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%