2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00211-009-0215-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computation of nonautonomous invariant and inertial manifolds

Abstract: We derive a numerical scheme to compute invariant manifolds for timevariant discrete dynamical systems, i.e., nonautonomous difference equations. Our universally applicable method is based on a truncated Lyapunov-Perron operator and computes invariant manifolds using a system of nonlinear algebraic equations which can be solved both locally using (nonsmooth) inexact Newton, and globally using continuation algorithms. Compared to other algorithms, our approach is quite flexible, since it captures time-dependent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof is conceptually similar to the analogous result in the framework of nonautonomous difference equations (see Pötzsche & Rasmussen (2008) and references therein), where complications due to the measurable time-dependence of (2.2) can be treated as in Aulbach & Wanner (1996). Hence, we present only an outline of the proof.…”
Section: Carathéodory Differential Equations and Integral Manifoldsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The proof is conceptually similar to the analogous result in the framework of nonautonomous difference equations (see Pötzsche & Rasmussen (2008) and references therein), where complications due to the measurable time-dependence of (2.2) can be treated as in Aulbach & Wanner (1996). Hence, we present only an outline of the proof.…”
Section: Carathéodory Differential Equations and Integral Manifoldsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…• Figure 5 demonstrates that Algorithm 3.3 with an adaptive integration scheme quad is robust and yields convergence for large values of ξ (also in comparison to the corresponding discrete examples discussed in Pötzsche & Rasmussen (2008)). Here, as predicted in Theorem 3.2, the error grows linearly with P + (τ)ξ , whereas the number of evaluations grows logarithmically.…”
Section: A Rotated Autonomous Examplementioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[24,10,39,38,34,11,30] and [24,10,39,38,34,11,7,30], respectively. Recently, the theory of inertial manifolds has been generalized to non-autonomous dynamical systems [40,4,27,36], and recently, to random dynamical systems [35], and [3] (and the references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%