2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-013-9800-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computation of Full-field Strains Using Principal Component Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 that there is only one dominant singular value, which is larger than the other singular values. This is agreed well with the fact that there is only one dominant deformation pattern in each direction [16]. It can be seen that the dominant singular values decrease monotonically with the decrease of SNR.…”
Section: Uniform Translationsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 that there is only one dominant singular value, which is larger than the other singular values. This is agreed well with the fact that there is only one dominant deformation pattern in each direction [16]. It can be seen that the dominant singular values decrease monotonically with the decrease of SNR.…”
Section: Uniform Translationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Zhao et al [14,15] proposed a fast Hermite element method and an improved Hermite finite element smoothing method to smooth and differentiate noisy displacement field in DIC. Grama and Subramanian [16] proposed a novel method for strain calculation from full-field data, which is based on the multivariate analysis technique of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) using which the singular vectors and singular values for each component of the displacement field were obtained. By choosing only the dominant singular values and their corresponding singular vectors, the dimensionality of the displacement data is sharply reduced and a significant portion of the noise is eliminated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As done in the numerical example, the deformation gradient F was computed applying the gradient function to the displacement field obtained by DIC, afterwards, all the other quantities were derived from F (i.e., ϵ , Δ ϵ , truetrueϵ˙^p, trueσ^, normalΔtrueε¯, and trueε¯). More advanced derivation functions could be used to evaluate the deformation gradient and the strain field, for example, using polynomials or other approaches . However, in the present application, the gradient function is satisfactory and produce accurate strain field maps, as illustrated in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strain component fields ε 1 , ε 2 and ε 6 are expressed as linear combinations of the piecewise-continuous p dominant [5] Right Eigenfunctions Left Eigenfunctions…”
Section: Modified Evfm Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…systematically constructed using the eigenfunctions [5] of the measured strain fields. The VFs so chosen have clear physical meaning and are directly determined using Principal Component Analysis of the measured strains and result in a compact set of algebraic equations in the unknown material parameters without introducing other unknown parameters to be solved for.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%