1989
DOI: 10.1109/22.24557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computation of fields in an arbitrary shaped heterogeneous dielectric or biological body by an iterative conjugate gradient method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since cube is a three-dimensional object with sharp corners, using the Volume Integral Method (VIM) with the volume discritized using cubical cells is said to be advantageous to use [11] even though it is computationally more intensive and time consuming compared to the surface integral equation. In spite of its complexity, it has been extensively used in the literature to analyze scattering from arbitrary shaped inhomogeneous objects [10]- [12].…”
Section: Volume Integral Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since cube is a three-dimensional object with sharp corners, using the Volume Integral Method (VIM) with the volume discritized using cubical cells is said to be advantageous to use [11] even though it is computationally more intensive and time consuming compared to the surface integral equation. In spite of its complexity, it has been extensively used in the literature to analyze scattering from arbitrary shaped inhomogeneous objects [10]- [12].…”
Section: Volume Integral Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the object is an infinite dielectric rod, a two-dimensional integral equation can be used, similar to (7) (see [8]): on (12) where is the contour enclosing the surface. The two-dimensional counterpart to a cube is a square.…”
Section: Integral Equation Formulation For the Potential Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the application is direct, however, when the dimension of the object is large relative to the wavelength in operation, enormous computational resources are required. This is overcome here by using a restart conjugate gradient method for the numerical solutions [8][9][10]. Some numerical simulation are demonstrated and the comparison with other solutions is presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of moment (MoM) is a direct boundary integral equation method, suitable for the analysis of electromagnetic scattering and diffraction problems [6][7][8][9][10], while the physical optics (PO) provides a short-wavelength assumption, in which only the illuminated parts of an object are taken into calculation. The MoM reduces the integral equation to a set of linear algebraic equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the PCMM using the subdomain method of moments including the S-PCMM, simultaneous equations with 3P unknowns must be solved if the polarization current density is expanded into P. If the Gaussian elimination method or Krawt method is used for the solution of the simultaneous equations, the computation time required is proportional to P 3 [16]. In order to reduce the computation time, a method using the iterative conjugate gradient method has been proposed [7,8]. On the other hand, a method has been proposed in which the polarization current density is expressed in terms of higher-order polynomials within the hexagonal body [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%