2008
DOI: 10.2528/pier07110803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computation of Em Field Scattered by an Open-Ended Cavity and by a Cavity Under Radome Using the Iterative Physical Optics

Abstract: Abstract-It is always a challenge to predict Radar Cross Section (RCS) of a full scale military platform with a good accuracy. Most of the time antennas and cavities are the main contributors of aircrafts RCS. Several methods have been developed to compute the RCS of cavities such as analytical methods (modal methods) and asymptotic methods (geometrical optics (GO) methods and physical optics (PO) methods). This article presents the Iterative Physical Optics (IPO) method which consists in an iterative resoluti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, they are compared with the Iterated Physical Optics (IPO) method [14] and the Multi-Level Fast Multipole Method (MLFMM) generated by the commercial software FEKO [21]. The MLFMM is based on the MoM and has the advantage to solve electromagnetic problem with many unknowns comparatively to the MoM.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, they are compared with the Iterated Physical Optics (IPO) method [14] and the Multi-Level Fast Multipole Method (MLFMM) generated by the commercial software FEKO [21]. The MLFMM is based on the MoM and has the advantage to solve electromagnetic problem with many unknowns comparatively to the MoM.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 2, the mathematical formulation is addressed for a waveguide connected to a bent waveguide of same cross section, and in Section 3, the formulation is generalized to a succession of bent waveguides connected between them. In Section 4, our approach is compared with two methods: (i) The Iterated Physical Optics (IPO) one, summarized in [14], which is very appropriate for large cross sections comparatively to the wavelength; (ii) The MultiLevel Fast Multipole Method (MLFMM) one, generated from the commercial software FEKO [21]. In this paper, the multiple-edge diffraction of modal rays across the aperture is assumed to be negligible for a large cross section of the waveguide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PO is an efficient high frequency method to calculate the scattering of the electrically large target surface. PTD is adopted to calculate the diffraction of the boundaries [10,11]. The body coordinate system OXY Z is fixed in the aircraft as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Monostatic Rcs Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the MOM analysis costs so large amount of computer memory and CPU time that the conventional personal computer can not accomplish the task, when the electrical size of the radome is very large, though some accelerating methods could be adopted [6][7][8]. Some high frequency techniques are suitable for electrically large radomes [9,10] but not accurate for discontinuous structures on the radome surfaces. Recently, a hybrid method combining physical optics (PO) and MOM together, PO-MOM, has been introduced to deal with the intractable problem and proved to be efficient [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%