2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00211-014-0665-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computation of eigenvalues by numerical upscaling

Abstract: Abstract. We present numerical upscaling techniques for a class of linear second-order self-adjoint elliptic partial differential operators (or their high-resolution finite element discretization). As prototypes for the application of our theory we consider benchmark multi-scale eigenvalue problems in reservoir modeling and material science. We compute a low-dimensional generalized (possibly mesh free) finite element space that preserves the lowermost eigenvalues in a superconvergent way. The approximate eigen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
67
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• SubInfo provides a list with different restriction operators for each sub-domain (actually our implementation provides this information via a generator). Each entry has to provide the following details: -SubInfo.R Restriction operator mapping from the fine space restriction to the patch, see equation (11). -SubInfo.RH Restriction operator mapping from the coarse space restriction to the patch, see equation (12).…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• SubInfo provides a list with different restriction operators for each sub-domain (actually our implementation provides this information via a generator). Each entry has to provide the following details: -SubInfo.R Restriction operator mapping from the fine space restriction to the patch, see equation (11). -SubInfo.RH Restriction operator mapping from the coarse space restriction to the patch, see equation (12).…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 4.1. It is shown in [40] that for approximate eigenvalues with respect to the LOD coarse spaces on scale H, a post-processing step can improve the eigenvalue error from H 4 to H 6 . The post-processing step is a correction with exact solve on the finest level.…”
Section: Spe10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although high-dimensional eigenvalue problems are ubiquitous in physical sciences, data and imaging sciences, and machine learning, the class of eigensolvers is not as diverse as that of linear solvers (which comprises many efficient algorithms such as geometric and algebraic multigrid [13,23], approximate Gaussian elimination [36], etc.). In particular, eigenvalue problems may involve operators with nonseparable multiple scales, and the nonlinear interplay between those coupled scales and the eigenvalue problem poses significant challenges for numerical analysis and scientific computing [4,16,64,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the main advantages is that no assumptions on scale separation or periodicity of the coefficient are needed. Recently, this technique has been applied to several other problems, for instance, semilinear elliptic equations [12], boundary value problems [11], eigenvalue problems [18], linear and semilinear parabolic equations [16], and the linear wave equation [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%