2009
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230761.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computability and Randomness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 426 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is convenient here to use Schnorr's martingale characterization [22,21,23,13,19,6] of the algorithmic randomness notion introduced by Martin-Löf [18]. If ν is a probability measure on Σ ∞ , then a ν-martingale is a function d : Σ * → [0, ∞) satisfying d(w)ν(w) = a∈Σ d(wa)ν(wa) for all w ∈ Σ * .…”
Section: For Everymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is convenient here to use Schnorr's martingale characterization [22,21,23,13,19,6] of the algorithmic randomness notion introduced by Martin-Löf [18]. If ν is a probability measure on Σ ∞ , then a ν-martingale is a function d : Σ * → [0, ∞) satisfying d(w)ν(w) = a∈Σ d(wa)ν(wa) for all w ∈ Σ * .…”
Section: For Everymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Nies [93]). A good account of this material can be found in Nies [94,95], but things are constantly changing, with perhaps seventeen characterizations of this class at present. We also refer to [46] for the situation up to mid-2010.…”
Section: Computability and Randomnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we have seen significant clarification as to the mathematical relationship between algorithmic computational power of infinite random sources and level algorithmic randomness. Much of this material has been reported in the short surveys Downey [41,42], Nies [95] and long surveys [40,47] and long monographs Downey and Hirschfeldt [46] and Nies [94]. Also the book edited by Hector Zenil [152] has a lot of discussion of randomness of varying levels of technicality, many aimed at a general audience.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now let C be a low c.e. set that is not K-trivial (for K-triviality see [4] or [12]). For example, one can take a low c.e.…”
Section: Theorem 23 (Day and Reimann)mentioning
confidence: 99%