2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4603(03)00089-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compulsive smoking: the development of a Rasch homogeneous scale of nicotine dependence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indicators were dropped based on having significant cross-loadings or a lack of salient loadings on any of the extracted factors (λ > .40; Brown, 2006). Table 4 outlines the initial PCA solution, showing the factor pattern to be similar for both the FTND-R and FTND, both of which were comprised of a two factor solution with items 2, 3, and 4 loadings on the first factor and items 1, 5, and 6 loading on the second factor, mirroring the solution identified in Breteler, Hilberink, Zeeman and Lammers (2004). Because of the significant cross-loadings, items 1 and 3 were dropped from the final solution, revealing a unifactoral solution for the FTND-R, and a two-factor solution for the FTND.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indicators were dropped based on having significant cross-loadings or a lack of salient loadings on any of the extracted factors (λ > .40; Brown, 2006). Table 4 outlines the initial PCA solution, showing the factor pattern to be similar for both the FTND-R and FTND, both of which were comprised of a two factor solution with items 2, 3, and 4 loadings on the first factor and items 1, 5, and 6 loading on the second factor, mirroring the solution identified in Breteler, Hilberink, Zeeman and Lammers (2004). Because of the significant cross-loadings, items 1 and 3 were dropped from the final solution, revealing a unifactoral solution for the FTND-R, and a two-factor solution for the FTND.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In various studies, question 1 ("How soon after you wake up do you smoke?") has been found to be present in both factors, (12,29) to be part of factor 2, (14,21,23,25) or to remain in factor 1. (7,16,27) Given that factor 2 consists of only two items in some studies, its ability to represent a single factor has been questioned.…”
Section: Test-retest Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, most recent studies have reported that the FTND measures two factors, with small differences observed among the questions that compose the factors. (7,12,14,16,21,23,(25)(26)(27)29) Regarding the distribution of the items by factor, questions 3 and 5 are believed to belong to a single factor related to the urgency to restore nicotine levels (factor 2, designated the "Smoking Pattern" factor), whereas questions 2, 4 and 6 are thought to be part of another factor related to the pattern of consumption (factor 1, designated the "Morning Pattern" factor). In various studies, question 1 ("How soon after you wake up do you smoke?")…”
Section: Test-retest Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discrimination parameters are akin to factor loadings in a factor analysis or structural equation model. In this light, Rodriguez and Audrain-McGovern [2004] describe a factor analysis of smoking-related sensations among adolescents, while a Rasch analysis of smoking behaviors among more advanced smokers is presented in Bretelera et al [2004]. Admittedly, our example is a bit different in that we are examining instances of smoking behavior, rather than smoking-related sensations and/or behaviors, however we feel that the IRT approach we describe addresses some very interesting smoking-related questions.…”
Section: Illustration: Adolescent Smoking Studymentioning
confidence: 99%