1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.48.1497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compton scattering from the proton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
153
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
153
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used two different data sets, i.e., all the available experimental data for the unpolarized cross sections below pion-production threshold, denoted as FULL data set 1 (for a total of 150 data points) [26,[31][32][33][34][36][37][38][39][40][41][42], and the data set given by the TAPS experiment alone (55 data points) [26], which is, by far, the most comprehensive available subset. "Improved" data sets have been defined in recent fits of RCS observables, by discarding some data points from different experiments [4,20,43].…”
Section: Fitting Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used two different data sets, i.e., all the available experimental data for the unpolarized cross sections below pion-production threshold, denoted as FULL data set 1 (for a total of 150 data points) [26,[31][32][33][34][36][37][38][39][40][41][42], and the data set given by the TAPS experiment alone (55 data points) [26], which is, by far, the most comprehensive available subset. "Improved" data sets have been defined in recent fits of RCS observables, by discarding some data points from different experiments [4,20,43].…”
Section: Fitting Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past decade a number of excellent experimental programs have been dedicated to these two processes (see Refs. [1][2][3][4][5] and [6][7][8][9][10], respectively). At low photon energies, these experiments probe the static properties of the nucleon, such as its electric charge, magnetic moment, and polarizabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 29 ± 7 ± 15 18.0 ± 5.9 ± 5.4 42.3 ± 6.0 ± 2.4 37.0 ± 5.0 ± 3.1 41.4 ± 7.7 ± 3.5 4 3± 11 ± 7 1. 33 41 ± 8 ± 10 33.0 ± 6.1 ± 3.1 39.7 ± 4.8 ± 3.2 31.1 ± 5.1 ± 3.4 28.8 ± 8.0 ± 6.5 20.9 ± 8.6 ± 1.4 1. 35 19.9 ± 4.8 ± 4.4 21.2 ± 4.2 ± 4.4 30.2 ± 4.0 ± 2.1 35.1 ± 6.6 ± 6.7 27.1 ± 8.3 ± 8.0 23.9 ± 8.8 ± 5.4 1.…”
Section: Appendix A: Cross Section Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 29 ± 10 ± 5 5 1± 10 ± 5 4 9 .2 ± 9.0 ± 3.1 58.3 ± 8.8 ± 3.7 1. 33 29.3 ± 8.5 ± 2.5 44± 10 ± 4 3 5 .0 ± 6.6 ± 4.3 39.8 ± 8.8 ± 2.7 1. 35 10.4 ± 5.0 ± 7.7 28.9 ± 9.7 ± 4.6 31.2 ± 5.4 ± 3.3 43± 11 ± 10 52 ± 19 ± 22 1.…”
Section: Appendix A: Cross Section Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation