2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressive strength and shrinkage of mortar containing various amounts of mineral additions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
39
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, after 10 days, the total shrinkage is 1042 μm/m, 946 μm/m, 865 μm/m, 831 μm/m, 795 μm/m and 735 μm/m respectively for 0% T, 10% T, 15% T, 20% T, 25% T, 30% T. This result agrees with those in the literature [29,30] which showed that the addition of slow-acting pozzolanic additions reduces the shrinkage of mortars by increasing the size of the capillary pores, which would reduce the capillary pressure and therefore, the shrinkage. Yilmaz and Ucar [31] also reported similar results for Tuff (clinoptilolite) and attributed this to the reduction in water evaporation used for the formation of new hydrates.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Thus, after 10 days, the total shrinkage is 1042 μm/m, 946 μm/m, 865 μm/m, 831 μm/m, 795 μm/m and 735 μm/m respectively for 0% T, 10% T, 15% T, 20% T, 25% T, 30% T. This result agrees with those in the literature [29,30] which showed that the addition of slow-acting pozzolanic additions reduces the shrinkage of mortars by increasing the size of the capillary pores, which would reduce the capillary pressure and therefore, the shrinkage. Yilmaz and Ucar [31] also reported similar results for Tuff (clinoptilolite) and attributed this to the reduction in water evaporation used for the formation of new hydrates.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…It offers many advantages such as re-use of industrial wastes, decreased CO 2 emissions during clinkerization (by limiting the clinker content in the cementitious material) and enhanced material properties such as workability and long-term compressive strength (Dubovoy et al 1986;Itim et al 2011). It is recommended for massive structures such as dams and bridges and for structures in aggressive environments (farm silos, water-treatment plants, mining) because of its low heat release, its high resistance to sulfate attack and chloride diffusion resulting from its low long-term porosity (Darquennes et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be therefore concluded that, in terms of the self weight, a water curing period of 7 days or 14 days leads to better values. Of course, air curing conditions would lead to even lower values for the self weight but it would be quite detrimental in terms of shrinkage cracking [26]. Even though the obtained results so far are encouraging, the authors deem necessary that further research work should be conducted in this field, especially in the direction of long term influence of novel Cementitious material and ordinary Portland cement on the mechanical properties of mortars.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%