2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressive and fatigue behavior of functionally graded Ti-6Al-4V meshes fabricated by electron beam melting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The loose sintering (compaction pressure is not applied) is the extreme case (maximum porosity) of the PM route [32][33][34]. However, an excessive porosity and/or deficient sinterability (quality of the necks) of titanium powder at low temperatures, may compromise the mechanical behavior [35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loose sintering (compaction pressure is not applied) is the extreme case (maximum porosity) of the PM route [32][33][34]. However, an excessive porosity and/or deficient sinterability (quality of the necks) of titanium powder at low temperatures, may compromise the mechanical behavior [35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical behaviour of complex graded lattice structures is not easily modelled outside the elastic deformation regime, making it difficult to accurately predict failure behaviour beyond bulk or global deformations. In order to better understand lattice failure, simple linearly graded structures have been widely studied in vitro [111,112]. Under compression, sequential collapse of layers prior to full densification of structures has been observed in graded lattices, both with linear and curved gradients in density, with no significant difference in the mechanical response to static and dynamic compression testing [113,114].…”
Section: Macroscale Implant Design For Stress Shieldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49 Many research groups are therefore studying the properties of graded designs and their potential in meeting competing design requirements. 24,[50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] Regardless of the type of design used, one of the first questions that we need to answer is ''what are the design requirements that AM porous biomaterials used as temporary or permanent bone substitutes need to satisfy?'' Once the design objectives are well defined, a host of analytical and computational techniques could be used to solve the inverse problem of finding the topological designs that best satisfy the design objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%