Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1992
DOI: 10.1177/004051759206200401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressional Energy of the Random Fiber Assembly

Abstract: The compressional mechanism of a random fiber assembly is analyzed by an energy method. An infinitesimal fiber segment, which is bounded by two neighboring contact points, is chosen as the unit bending element. The geometry of this element is characterized by its arc length, curvature, and orientation. The change in bending energy of each fiber segment due to the compression of the assembly is derived in terms of the compressional strain and the Poisson's ratio of the assembly. The summation of each energy con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this model, the wool assembly was treated as a layered system with fiber bending deflection between neighboring contacts, while no fiber elongation, contraction, or torsion were considered. Based largely on this scheme, several refined models have been proposed [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] to account for fiber slippage, large deformation, and hybrid fiber systems. The fundamental assumption of these models is the constant force distribution across any FN section, which may conflict with the deformation compatibility of fiber segments in the assembly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, the wool assembly was treated as a layered system with fiber bending deflection between neighboring contacts, while no fiber elongation, contraction, or torsion were considered. Based largely on this scheme, several refined models have been proposed [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] to account for fiber slippage, large deformation, and hybrid fiber systems. The fundamental assumption of these models is the constant force distribution across any FN section, which may conflict with the deformation compatibility of fiber segments in the assembly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a uniaxial deformation with ε 11 = ε and ε 22 = ε 33 = −ν m ε, and assuming that the fiber orientation distribution is uniform, one may write the strain energy density of an affinely deforming network as [20,21]: uaffn=14ρEfAf0πsinφtrue((1νmε)2sinφ2+(1+ε)2cosφ21true)2dφ=14ρEfAfFfalse(εfalse) where φ is the angle made by the direction of given fiber with the x 1 axis and F (ε) represents the integral. Requiring that this energy density equals 1/2Eaffnε2, leads to Eaffn=12ρEfAfFfalse(εfalse)/ε2 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar models based on the affine deformation assumption have been derived for athermal networks (e.g. Lee and Carnaby, 1992; Wu and Dzenis, 2005). Further developments of the theory of molecular networks partially relaxed the affine deformation restriction while considering a small number of chains as being representative for the entire network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%