2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2014.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compression force behaviours: An exploration of the beliefs and values influencing the application of breast compression during screening mammography

Abstract: Introduction and backgroundBreast compression force during screening mammography requires a degree of practitioner knowledge and expertise to achieve optimum image quality and reduce the mean glandular radiation dose.1, 2 Whilst it is recognised that the application of compression force is an Whilst quantitative approaches give valuable data, a humanistic, qualitative, perspective is also required in order to fully understand this phenomenon in depth and to provide a unique insight in to the factors influencin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative analysis.E-learning group got better scores in knowledge and course satisfaction. E-learning may be some complementary solution to solve challenges in learning breast imaging.[30]UKTo study compression behaviours of practitioners during screening mammography.Qualitative research with 6 focus group interviews ( n  = 41 practitioners) in six breast screening centres in England.Interview focused on experiences of, the influence on behaviour of practitioners applying compression force in mammography.a and c) viewpoints of practitioners’ use of compression during screening MG: patient empowerment, white lies, time for interactions, uncertainty of own practice, culture using compression force, power/medical dominance, compression controls, digital technology, dose audit-safety net and a numerical scale of compression force.a) 8 c) 4[35]NetherlandsTo compare mammography performed with and without radiolucent positioning sheets. N  = 184/179 women screened in the Dutch breast screening programme, providing written informed consent to have one additional image taken with positioning sheets.Measures: projected breast area, image quality, pain experience and radiation dose. Quantitative analysis.a) With positioning sheets significantly more pectoral muscle, lateral and medial breast tissue was projected (CC-views) and more and deeper depicted pectoral muscle (MLO-views).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative analysis.E-learning group got better scores in knowledge and course satisfaction. E-learning may be some complementary solution to solve challenges in learning breast imaging.[30]UKTo study compression behaviours of practitioners during screening mammography.Qualitative research with 6 focus group interviews ( n  = 41 practitioners) in six breast screening centres in England.Interview focused on experiences of, the influence on behaviour of practitioners applying compression force in mammography.a and c) viewpoints of practitioners’ use of compression during screening MG: patient empowerment, white lies, time for interactions, uncertainty of own practice, culture using compression force, power/medical dominance, compression controls, digital technology, dose audit-safety net and a numerical scale of compression force.a) 8 c) 4[35]NetherlandsTo compare mammography performed with and without radiolucent positioning sheets. N  = 184/179 women screened in the Dutch breast screening programme, providing written informed consent to have one additional image taken with positioning sheets.Measures: projected breast area, image quality, pain experience and radiation dose. Quantitative analysis.a) With positioning sheets significantly more pectoral muscle, lateral and medial breast tissue was projected (CC-views) and more and deeper depicted pectoral muscle (MLO-views).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the mammographers believed that empowering clients was important, they sometimes experienced limitations in the extent to which it was feasible and found themselves taking a more authoritarian approach. Two recent papers based on a qualitative dataset from mammographer focus groups have explored beliefs, values and decision‐making by mammographers in applying compression to the breast (Murphy et al., ; Nightingale, Murphy, Robinson, Newton‐Hughes, & Hogg, ). In common with our study, both these analyses highlighted the tension between the technical and the caring demands of the mammography examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murphy et al postulated that the application of compression force may require a high degree of problem solving and decision making, 12 and our article explores this concept further. There is sparse evidence related to problem solving within radiography [13][14][15] and none within mammography.…”
Section: -11mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This research involves the analysis of existing qualitative research data, 12 aiming to propose a problem solving model for compression force application with due regard to existing models of problem solving and decision making.…”
Section: -11mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation